Skip to main content
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
Get full digital access to globeandmail.com
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
A scary good deal on trusted journalism
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
SAVE OVER $140
OFFER ENDS OCTOBER 31
// //

Canada’s accountants say it is time to decide on a universal approach to replace a dizzying array of reporting standards for environmental, social and governance issues – and that companies should make their voices heard in an international push to come up with one.

Chartered Professional Accountants of Canada, the industry body, says business is made more difficult and costly by multiple frameworks for disclosing sustainability issues. Investors and ratings agencies demand disclosure in the platforms of their choice. Meanwhile, small and medium-sized enterprises have fewer financial resources to meet these standards.

“Over all, the general consensus is that the current reporting landscape is complex, not well understood and involves a number of different players. And the rules of those different players are similarly not really well understood,” said CPA Canada vice-president Gord Beal.

Story continues below advertisement

“Organizations that we have spoken with through our research over the last number of years have expressed frustration with this fragmented reporting environment.”

The group is calling on private- and public-sector leaders to contribute to an effort by the International Financial Reporting Standards Foundation (IFRS) to develop a global sustainability standards board. The body has set up a “technical readiness working group” and is looking to have a plan for standardization well under way by November, when countries meet in Glasgow, Scotland, for the next United Nations climate conference.

CPA Canada, whose members are instrumental in the smooth running of companies, investment funds and capital markets, says Canadian business leaders have earned a good reputation for working with international bodies on sustainability issues, and have an important role to play in this initiative.

ESG reporting has become an alphabet soup of platforms for disclosing such things as board and management gender diversity, environmental impact, labour relations and charitable giving. Among approaches in use now are those developed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB), Global Reporting Initiative and Principles for Responsible Investment, among others.

On climate-specific data, the world is coalescing around the Financial Stability Board’s Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) as the standard template for disclosing emissions and analyzing the risks to businesses from global warming and policies to combat it.

It makes sense that accountants would call for a standard global approach to ESG disclosure – indeed, they shaped standardization in financial reporting. Accepted accounting principles allow investors, companies, financial institutions, rating agencies and governments to speak a common language when it comes to analyzing earnings reports, balance sheets and public accounts.

Now, sustainability factors are catching up in importance when it comes to evaluating businesses, and that has exposed the problems with numerous platforms for reporting. There is already a push to come up with standardization domestically.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada’s eight largest pension funds, including the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec and Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan, have called on corporations to improve their ESG disclosures by reporting data in a standardized fashion. The group, representing $1.6-trillion in assets, backs the SASB approach.

The federal government has been pushing wider adoption of TCFD reporting in Canada’s public and private sectors as it seeks to achieve its commitments made under the Paris agreement. This standard is a good place to start for a global sustainability body, Mr. Beal said.

“The whole area around sustainability reporting encompasses much more than climate change, but to start with that is an excellent opportunity to really focus the resources because the board will have limited resources to focus,” he said. “We as an organization, from a practical point of view, support an initial focus on that climate element given its pervasiveness and urgency.”

With calls getting louder for standardization, a big question is whether Canadian governments and regulators will get tougher in enforcing more and better disclosure. So far, many have made recommendations, but have yet to mandate reporting and decide which standards to use.

Better global co-ordination could make that easier. In Canada, small and medium-sized businesses have been among the most adamant that a universal approach is needed, said Rosemary McGuire, CPA Canada’s director of external reporting, research and guidance. This is a bit counterintuitive, as such enterprises normally lead the charge in calling for reduced regulatory burdens.

“In fact, it’s been opposite for them, which is, ‘We don’t have the time [or] resources to spend navigating and figuring out what we need to do. Please provide us with more clarity and direction in this space so that we can optimize our resources in the most effective way,’ ” she said.

Story continues below advertisement

Jeffrey Jones writes about sustainable finance and the ESG sector for The Globe and Mail. E-mail him at jeffjones@globeandmail.com.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies