Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Jake Fuss and Milagros Palacios are economists at the Fraser Institute.

Governments across Canada will soon unveil their tax and spending plans in their 2020 budgets. This year’s budget season provides an opportunity for the federal and provincial governments to reverse the trend of debt accumulation we’ve seen for more than a decade.

Since 2007-08, combined federal and provincial government net debt (gross debt minus financial liabilities) has grown to $1.5-trillion from $837.0-billion – an increase of more than $650-billion in 12 years – largely because of increased government spending. Put differently, today’s federal-provincial net debt breaks down to $39,483 of government debt for every man, woman and child in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

While nominal federal and provincial debt levels rose in every province between 2007-08 and 2019-20, Canadians face different debt burdens depending on where they live. Provincial debt levels vary widely and the federal debt burden is unevenly distributed among provinces.

So, who are the most government-debt-ridden Canadians?

As noted in a new Fraser Institute study, Newfoundland and Labrador has the highest per-person combined (provincial and federal) government debt among the provinces. Each Newfoundland resident bears $48,478 in government debt. Ontario ranks a close second with a $45,891 combined government debt burden.

The debt-to-GDP ratio (a measure that compares debt with the size of the overall economy) is another way to compare government debt between provinces and evaluate the sustainability of debt accumulation. Under this measure, Ontario has the highest combined debt burden at 75.4 per cent of the economy, followed by Newfoundland at 73.6 per cent.

Nationally, the combined federal-provincial net debt-to-GDP ratio in Canada is projected to climb to 64.3 per cent in 2019-20 from 53.1 per cent in 2007-08. And this growth is likely to continue in the future.

Moreover, Canada’s aging population will put upward pressure on health-care costs, which may well cause further increases in federal and provincial debt burdens now and in the future. A higher proportion of Canadians older than 65 will prompt more spending on health care and seniors’ benefits, contributing to larger budget deficits and more debt.

Without any policy changes, current projections from the Department of Finance suggest the federal government will not balance its budget until 2040, while several provinces look likely to continue racking up debt for the foreseeable future.

Story continues below advertisement

But what are the consequences of all this growing government debt?

For starters, governments must pay interest on their debt, just like households must pay interest on mortgages, vehicle purchases and credit cards. Taken together, the federal and provincial governments spend almost $55-billion in annual interest payments, which leaves fewer resources for tax cuts or government programs, such as health care, education and social services.

Growing government debt can also negatively affect economic growth and productivity. For example, large increases in government debt can lead to rising interest rates. The resulting higher borrowing costs then hinder productivity by reducing the incentive for private capital investment.

Ultimately, increasing government debt not only burdens current taxpayers, but also future generations of Canadians, who will repay the debt and cover the interest payments, potentially through higher taxes. And these higher-than-anticipated taxes could also hamper future economic performance and the ability of provinces to compete with one another – and other jurisdictions worldwide – for business investment and high-skilled workers.

Clearly, rising government debt has negative consequences for Canadians, as resources flow toward interest payments and away from public priorities that help families or improve Canada’s economic competitiveness. This coming budget season, Ottawa and the provinces have an opportunity to reduce the burden on taxpayers by better controlling government spending – the first and most important step in addressing our growing debt problem.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies