Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The financial markets are bracing for the coronavirus outbreak to seriously infect the Canadian economy. The reality is more likely to be a case of the sniffles.

As global bond and equity markets have been busily repositioning for what they perceive as a growing threat that a coronavirus pandemic poses to the global economy, traders in Canadian interest-rate derivatives have joined the pessimism party. Traders were already pricing in one quarter-percentage-point rate cut in the coming months after last week’s Bank of Canada outlook update; in the past few days, they have tacked on a 40-per-cent chance of a second cut before the year is out.

Their knee-jerk reaction is baseless. Realistically, there’s more evidence that this will be a tempest in a teapot than a meaningful threat to Canada’s economic outlook and, by extension, to the Bank of Canada’s rate position.

Story continues below advertisement

Sure, when you look at some of the estimates from credible sources for what a genuine global pandemic could inflict on the world economy, the nervousness isn’t surprising. The World Bank has estimated that a “moderately virulent” global influenza pandemic would cost more than 2 per cent of global gross domestic product (GDP). That’s about double last year’s estimated impact of the U.S.-China trade war.

A much bigger crisis, on the scale of the devastating 1918 flu pandemic, the World Bank says, would put a dent of almost 5 per cent in the world economy. That would plunge us into a global recession – and a fairly deep one at that.

But that scenario is based on not only one of the worst pandemics in human history (at least 50 million dead), but one that took place more than 100 years ago. To see a similar relative degree of devastation today, we’d need to suffer more than 200 million deaths worldwide – and to forget the dramatic medical and epidemiological advances of the past century.

When dealing with more realistic scenarios, the World Bank’s models identify Canada as among the economies least exposed to the effects of a global pandemic, thanks largely to the country’s highly advanced health-care system. Simulations predict that Canada would lose something less than 0.5 per cent of GDP in a moderate pandemic.

Many economists are turning to the last global outbreak that reached Canadian shores in a significant way – the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) crisis of 2003 – as a useful guide. At the height of SARS, Canada’s economy contracted for two consecutive months, in March and April; the Bank of Canada estimated that SARS effects subtracted about 0.6 percentage points from the annualized pace of GDP growth in the second quarter of 2003.

But in that case, Canada’s biggest city and financial centre, Toronto, was one of the most seriously infected cities in the world – prompting the World Health Organization to issue an advisory against travelling to Toronto in April, 2003. Although the WHO lifted the advisory a week later, the scare put a longer-lasting chill on Toronto’s and Canada’s tourism industry, which suffered the bulk of the economic fallout from SARS. A Conference Board of Canada study attributed about 70 per cent of Canada’s SARS-related economic losses to travel and tourism, more than half of that in Toronto alone. It estimated that the SARS outbreak reduced Toronto’s travel and tourism spending by 22 per cent in the second quarter of 2003, and nearly 9 per cent for the year as a whole.

Even then, the damage inflicted on the overall economy proved temporary and fairly small. The SARS effects largely reversed in subsequent quarters. Bank of Canada estimates put the overall SARS cost at about 0.1 per cent of GDP for 2003 as a whole; the Conference Board study pegged the damage at 0.15 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

That’s pretty much a rounding error as far as economic forecasting goes – not nearly enough to sway the Bank of Canada’s interest-rate policy. And even to get that rounding error, we’d have to see fairly substantial Canadian exposure to the outbreak. If Toronto hadn’t been hit with the highest incidence of SARS outside of China and, especially, the WHO travel warning, the disease would have been essentially a non-event for Canada’s overall economy.

Nevertheless, the SARS experience suggests that to the extent that there is an impact, it will be concentrated in a relatively short time frame. That short-term shock could influence timing of a Bank of Canada rate cut, even if it doesn’t imply deeper cuts.

Bank of Nova Scotia economist Derek Holt argued this week that with the Canadian economy already in a weakened state heading into the coronavirus scare, the central bank may want to step in with a rate cut sooner rather than later. An early cut – rather than an additional cut – would be the more sensible route to cushioning what is more likely than not to be a glancing economic blow.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies