Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Jodi Kovitz is the founder and CEO of #movethedial, a Toronto-based organization dedicated to the advancement of women in tech. Dr. Sarah Saska is the co-founder and CEO of Feminuity, a global diversity, equity, and inclusion strategy firm.

Women account for 25 per cent of Canada’s technology sector, a number that has remained stagnant for the past 10 years despite the rapid growth in the market. To address this, many thoughtful Canadian technology companies devote considerable time, energy and resources to recruiting more women.

But what happens once they’re in?

Research abounds indicating women are underrepresented, marginalized and underpaid in the technology sector. Various forms of discrimination and unfairness are the most commonly cited reasons people leave their jobs at tech companies and this turnover costs the U.S. technology sector US$16-billion annually. Women, particularly those with other marginalized identities – such as those who are also Indigenous, racialized, transgender or living with a disability – are disproportionately affected by experiences of discrimination and unfairness. While we do not have a comparable study of the Canadian technology sector as of now, we know that people leave their jobs in tech at higher rates in Canada (16.9 per cent) than in the United States (13.2 per cent).

Story continues below advertisement

Why is this happening?

While many technology companies invest in recruitment efforts specifically designed to get women in the door, few consider the lived, day-to-day experiences of these employees once they are in. With a sophisticated recruitment strategy, a company may get a diversity of women in the door – those with a range of perspectives, skill sets and lived experiences – but if these same women, once in, are not supported by the internal systems and processes of the company, or don’t feel meaningfully included in the culture, we’re no further ahead.

This is because a company can be diverse – in terms of its teams, departments and overall composition – without being equitable or inclusive. Let that sink in. Unless a company invests equal amounts of time, energy and resources internally – designing policies, processes and physical spaces that are equitable and inclusive so women feel a sense of belonging – women are likely to leave. For example, companies may want to consider offering flex-hours; providing support for caregiving duties through a safe, clean and private space for feeding; offering clear pathways for advancement; and establishing clearly communicated harassment policies.

While women may not share their true reasons for leaving, whether due to a fear of recrimination or something else, they’ll leave and they’re likely to tell women around them about their experiences. The whisper network is a powerful force and in time, it’ll make it more difficult for these companies to recruit women, rendering their initial investment in recruitment futile.

If a company has yet to invest equal amounts of time, energy and resources to design policies, processes and physical spaces that are equitable and inclusive, it should slow down or pause its recruitment efforts.

Move forward equitably and inclusively

A critical first step is for companies to understand that an “off-the-shelf” approach will not suffice. While women may share some common experiences related to being underrepresented, marginalized and underpaid in tech, women are not all the same. For example, women who are new parents or have recently miscarried or who’ve lost a child or have chosen to never have children will all require different support.

Gender identity is just one aspect of a woman’s identity; women are also affected by their socioeconomic status, socialized race and skin colour, sexual orientation, age, body shape, body size and proficiency in English to name a few.

Companies must be thoughtful about how organizational practices affect a diversity of women – those of all experiences and identities – not just women who are most visible in their companies. When companies seek to understand the needs of those on the margins and design solutions accordingly, they begin to build cultures that are more equitable and more inclusive.

Story continues below advertisement

Companies that focus on these efforts internally will be able to spend far less time, energy and resources on their recruitment efforts. And their retention rates will follow.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies