Skip to main content

Parisa Mahboubi is a Senior Policy Analyst at the C.D. Howe Institute.

The largest one-time increase in the minimum-wage rate that any province experienced over the past two decades happened in Ontario at the beginning of the year. The early results are in: As anticipated, it has caused a reduction in youth employment, but this dramatic minimum-wage increase has also extensively hurt the employment of older workers.

The Ontario government increased its minimum wage to $14 an hour on Jan. 1 from $11.40 an hour; a 23-per-cent boost. The real impact of a higher minimum wage, however, depends on how businesses absorb the increase in operating expenses when labour costs go up.

Story continues below advertisement

Did employers cut back on the number of workers?

Comparing the pre- and post-January three-month averages of the number of employed persons in the Labour Force Survey shows Canada lost 260,000 full-time jobs in the first quarter of 2018. Part-time jobs fell too, by 29,000. Of the total reductions in full-time and part-time employment, 43 per cent and 70 per cent, respectively, were from Ontario. The greater Ontario share of part-time employment loss can probably be attributed to its minimum-wage increase since minimum-wage earners are more likely to hold part-time positions.

In Canada, employment declined across all age groups except among adults aged 25 to 54 in part-time employment for whom there were 18,000 new jobs. However, there was no contribution from Ontario, which experienced about 500 job losses.

Canada as a whole, however, lost about 25,000 full-time jobs among adults aged 55 and older. Ontario was solely responsible for this decline since its loss of 39,000 full-time positions offset all employment gains among adults aged 55 and older in the rest of the country.

The reduction in employment of full-time workers aged 55 and older in Ontario is surprising since minimum-wage increases have historically had positive impacts on employment. This observation can imply that the substantial minimum-wage hike in Ontario has extended its impacts to full-time employment of older adults, particularly among those aged 55 to 65.

According to previous Canadian studies, minimum-wage increases disproportionately affect employment of teens. Ontario’s minimum-wage increase also seems to have the largest impact on young people (15 to 24 years old). As opposed to the rest of Canada, the largest employment losses in Ontario were among youth followed by older adults over 54 while those aged 24 to 54 experienced a negligible reduction in full-time and part-time employment.

A recent publication by Statistics Canada looks closely at the age distribution and family types of minimum-wage earners. It showed that there has been a shift in the composition of minimum-wage earners from youth toward older workers as a consequence of the latest minimum-wage increases in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

The question now is how government can help low-income earners without affecting their employment. The new government of Ontario has proposed a minimum-wage tax credit in lieu of the previously scheduled minimum wage boost in 2019. However, a minimum-wage tax credit poses some challenges, such as who should be included to ensure its fairness and how to eliminate any disincentive effects on behaviour of other low-income earners. For example, this policy would hurt those who earn slightly above the minimum wage as they would not receive a minimum-wage tax credit and it would, therefore, create an incentive for workers to remain at the minimum-wage rate. As such, a tax credit that takes into account all low-income earners is more effective.

The January minimum-wage increase in Ontario has affected the employment of workers in a broad age range. Alternative policies to provide financial support for low-income families without causing any employment loss or distorting incentives to work might include a tax credit that includes income-tested clawbacks.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter