Skip to main content
//empty //empty

Peter St. Onge, senior economist at the Montreal Economic Institute, and Daniel Dufort, senior director of external relations at MEI

Now that British Columbians can finally hail a ride-share on their phone – a right Quebeckers only won last year – a new threat is emerging, this time from California.

Casual or “gig” work has been around a very long time, but the sharing economy has put freelancers in the spotlight. It’s especially important for workers who can only work part-time: single parents, college students, the elderly and seasonal workers. These groups have long counted on the ability to work flexible hours when they really need to, be they waiters, nannies, deliverymen or translators.

Story continues below advertisement

What has changed is the dramatic creation of new part-time jobs thanks to the internet and cellphone apps. These have expanded the range of services people are willing to hire for, and made it much easier both to work and to hire people for casual work. The sharing economy has created more than 60,000 Canadian jobs a year on average between 2005 and 2016. This has been fantastic for consumers, who can now easily hire someone to deliver the groceries, shovel the driveway, walk the dog, mow the lawn or walk them to their car safely at night. And, of course, now you can call a cab that actually comes on time.

So far, labour laws have helped by sheltering casual workers from the hassle of paperwork, and employers from the risks inherent in hiring permanent employees. Unfortunately, regulators are becoming hostile to this new job creation. California Assembly Bill 5 (AB 5), which took effect on Jan. 1, effectively turns freelancers into employees. The goal was to improve conditions for gig workers, but, in practice, it has meant the disappearance of their jobs. Mass layoffs of part-time and full-time freelance workers have occurred in the media and the film industry, with fears of more to come.

The experience of California illustrates why governments should avoid interfering in the sharing economy. Despite good intentions, forcing employers to provide benefits to contract workers risks pricing low-wage workers out of employment altogether. Studies have also shown that even when the company is paying for the benefits, the costs get directly passed along to the employees. So even workers who don’t lose their jobs end up paying for the mandated benefits through reduced wages.

Empirically, job losses from mandatory benefits disproportionately target low-income workers. A similar phenomenon occurred in Ontario where an Montreal Economic Institute study estimated that 50,000 young workers lost their job in the wake of a hike in the minimum wage from $11.49 to $14 on Jan. 1, 2018.

Losing one’s job not only hurts the worker today, but can negatively affect future job prospects. One study found that the simple fact of having a part-time job reduces the odds of being unemployed a year later by more than 80 per cent – from 25 per cent for unemployed workers to just 4 per cent for part-time workers. Working part-time also considerably increases the chances of having the work situation you prefer a year later, whether full-time or part-time, from 41 per cent for those unemployed to 69 per cent for part-time workers. In other words, a great way to get the job you want is to work any job right now.

Flexibility is key to the sharing economy: to work, to hire, to buy and sell. Even those who do it for the money may only be able to work part-time because of school, or are semi-retired workers who prefer only working a few hours each week. Statistics Canada estimates that only one in four part-time workers (24 per cent) are led to work part-time for economic reasons. Nearly half (48 per cent) have to care for children or other family members, have a disability, or are going to school, while 28 per cent have voluntarily chosen to work part-time. A poll conducted in the United States in August, 2018, showed that only 7 per cent of American contract workers would rather be considered as full employees.

The Canadian economy is already one of great upward mobility. A 2012 study of census data found that 83 per cent of Canadians in the bottom 20 per cent of income earners in 1990 had moved up to a higher income category 10 years later. In 2009, the percentage of those who had risen into a higher bracket was 87 per cent, with 40 per cent having even reached the two highest quintiles. However, temporary jobs at the bottom of the ladder are often a prerequisite for this phenomenon to endure.

Story continues below advertisement

Too often, lawmakers propose reforms that might sound good, but actually make the problem worse. Instead of making it harder to hire freelancers and part-time workers, lawmakers should be making it easier. The freedom to contract and work as one pleases is not only a fundamental right, it is among the most effective ways to help marginal workers who need that first rung on the ladder.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies