Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Catherine McCall is executive director for the Canadian Coalition for Good Governance. Edward Waitzer is a lawyer and former chair of the Ontario Securities Commission. He has advised and made representations on behalf of Broadridge Financial Solutions on the Ontario Capital Markets Modernization Taskforce’s recommendations. The views expressed are his own.

The final recommendations of the Ontario Capital Markets Modernization Taskforce, released in January, are admirable both for their breadth and ambition.

As the first significant review of Ontario’s securities regulation in almost 20 years, the task force’s challenge was to propose regulatory reforms responsive to transformational events that have occurred, including technological innovation, the 2008 financial crisis and other systemic risks (such as climate change, the pandemic and growing social and economic inequality). The goal is to ensure regulation that promotes the effective mobilization and allocation of savings to facilitate prosperity for current and future generations.

Story continues below advertisement

The 74 task force recommendations have much to offer investors. Many can be implemented immediately.

Strengthening shareholder democracy through mandatory majority voting and say on pay are important measures, as is requiring disclosure of the environmental, social and governance matters that institutional investors should incorporate into their investment and voting decisions to accurately reflect risk-adjusted returns. Investors should also be pleased by recommendations to require enhanced staff diversity disclosure, universal proxies and a focus on reducing the overvoting of proxies, which disconnects equity ownership from voting rights.

So, where did the task force fall short?

It failed to undertake the level of analysis that should be expected (and is required of the Ontario Securities Commission, or OSC) before policy recommendations can be acted on. That would have included a discussion of costs, benefits and alternatives considered.

With respect to several recommendations, much of this work has already been undertaken by the Canadian Securities Administrators but is not acknowledged or addressed by the task force. It also failed to reflect the role and contribution of investors in our capital markets. This superficiality does a disservice to the task force’s efforts and, if used as the basis for policy making, could undermine public confidence in the integrity of our regulatory framework and markets.

For example, the task force recommends that as of Sept. 1, 2022, reporting issuers be able to obtain the identities and securities holdings of all beneficial owners. A policy discussion that has been under way for decades is addressed in less than a page, with a radical recommendation justified by an unsupported statement that the current system hinders the ability of issuers to engage in dialogue with investors and raises (unspecified) concerns about the overall transparency of the proxy voting process.

In Canada as well as the United States, a growing majority of retail and institutional investors do not support such transparency and choose to withhold such consent when they have the option, but this is not acknowledged. Nor is there any effort to address policy concerns about personal privacy and the use of personal data or the obligations of intermediaries to provide guidance to clients and safeguard their information.

Story continues below advertisement

Likewise, there is no analysis to underpin the task force’s recommendation for a proposed “access equals delivery” model of disseminating corporate disclosure to investors. Without some form of notification, access (that is, posting on the internet) will in practice amount to no delivery at all, resulting in a significant diminution of investor education, engagement and protection. The task force failed to consider other opportunities for cost savings and efficiencies that might better enhance, rather than compromise, the quality of investor communications through the adoption of existing digital solutions.

The task force revisits the regulation of proxy advisers without acknowledging the extensive work recently undertaken by the Canadian Securities Administrators (or by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission). Their analysis is based on unsubstantiated assumptions of influence and error. The recommendations disregard the essential services proxy advisers provide to institutional investors.

Of immediate concern are the recommendations, which the government proposes to enact through its pending budget bill, to add “facilitating capital formation” and “competition” to the OSC’s statutory mandate and to adopt a new statute, based on one that has been under development for the past decade in connection with the yet-to-be-realized national securities regulator.

There is little discussion of why the existing statute or the OSC’s dual mandate of fostering fair and efficient capital markets and protecting investors are no longer fit for the purpose or how changing the mandate might skew the commission’s perspective and independence. Absent analysis, the suggestion that changing the mandate will “encourage economic growth” is an exercise in political wishful thinking. Nor is it clear what the task force thinks Ontario will achieve by going it alone on a new statute, which goes against the co-ordinated effort with other provinces that has lasted for years.

Institutional investors increasingly play a stewardship role in ensuring a sustainable economy, with the power to affect economic and social change for the better while safeguarding Ontarians’ savings. Capital markets regulation should advance and not compromise these goals. Efforts to effect reform without undertaking the required analysis will diminish the OSC’s status and effectiveness and undermine public confidence in Canadian capital markets.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies