Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Examining the economic data of 2020, there’s no question that the federal government’s emergency income-replacement programs were a critical lifeline for Canada during the pandemic. We would have plunged into a much deeper economic hole without them, would have recovered from the spring lockdowns much more slowly and would be in much worse shape heading into 2021.

But now that the smoke has cleared a bit, there are some legitimate questions about the role those programs have played in positioning the economy for the next phase – especially with the country facing another slowdown, as rising COVID-19 infection rates have forced new lockdowns. In particular, it’s important to understand the impact the two biggest income supports – the Canada Emergency Response Benefit (CERB) for laid-off workers and the Canada Emergency Wage Subsidy (CEWS) for businesses – have had in holding the economy together.

A recent paper from the Bank of Canada’s research department illustrates the critical role wage subsidies will play in 2021 to limit longer-term damage from the crisis.

Story continues below advertisement

The paper – a collaborative work by researchers at the Bank of Canada, the Federal Reserve of St. Louis, the Federal Reserve of New York and the University of Melbourne – examines the relative effectiveness in a pandemic of expanding unemployment benefits (à la CERB) versus subsidizing employers’ wage costs (à la CEWS). It found that, when taken in isolation, wage subsidies provide the more valuable economic support. While CERB-like income supports serve a vital role in containing the pandemic by keeping people at home, CEWS-like wage subsidies serve to maintain the links between skilled workers and their employers; if those links were allowed to break, the result would be serious long-term damage to the economy.

Still, the researchers found, an even better result comes from applying both unemployment benefit enhancements and wage subsidies. It’s not a matter of choosing one over the other.

“The two policies are complementary, catering to different rungs of the productivity ladder,” the authors said. “UI provides additional insurance to job losers who fall off the job ladder, whereas payroll subsidies preserve workers’ positions along the ladder.”

Fortunately, Ottawa didn’t choose one over the other. Estimates contained in last month’s fall economic statement show that the government has invested heavily, and almost evenly, in the two supports for the 2020-2021 budget year: $90-billion on the CERB and its successor, the Canada Recovery Benefit (CRB), and $83.5-billion on the CEWS.

There’s little doubt the CERB was vital in bridging the economy over the severe impact of the spring lockdowns and fed the rapid resurgence in consumer spending that led the postlockdown rebound. The benefits, it turned out, actually more than replaced the wages lost to the shutdowns, providing critical fuel for consumption.

But that could only take us so far. We arrived in the fall with the rebound waning, the economy still running roughly 5 per cent below its prepandemic pace and roughly 600,000 jobs still missing. The nagging long-term risk is the degree to which these jobs and production aren’t returning – how much capacity has been destroyed by the ruptures of the pandemic. That risk will only deepen with the new round of shutdowns.

For the labour market, the danger lies in business failures and permanent job cuts, which would snap those critical worker-employer ties and can take a very long time to rebuild. It destroys what the Bank of Canada paper refers to as “match capital” – the matching of labour skills and training to a specific job and employer, which builds and deepens the longer the employer and employee are together. This destruction will leave the economy with not only elevated unemployment but skills mismatches on a large scale, making for an inefficient use of labour that could damage productivity and hold back the postpandemic recovery.

Story continues below advertisement

“The lost match capital results in persistently low average labor productivity and low post-containment output, as the newly formed jobs are low-productivity ones. Payroll subsidies achieve the opposite, by preserving existing matches because they allow financially constrained firms that would otherwise engage in layoffs to continue operating. The preservation of match capital softens the decline in employment, productivity and output, and the economy recovers faster,” the authors wrote.

It’s incumbent, then, to sustain those bonds beyond the latest wave of the crisis, as they represent the best chance for both workers and employers to return to full health and thrive in the recovery. As jobs gradually return and fractured businesses and industries try to mend the damage, the government’s wage subsidy program will go a long way to determining just how far and how fast this economy can come back.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies