Skip to main content

An employee of DynaIndustrial, a heavy industrial fabrication company, welds at the company's Regina location.

Mark Taylor/The Globe and Mail

David Agnew is president of Seneca College and vice-chair of Polytechnics Canada.

The rebuilding of the Canadian economy in the wake of the pandemic is an opportunity – even an obligation – to finally get short-term skills training right. And on a massive scale.

Governments of all stripes and jurisdictions have developed dozens, if not hundreds, of training programs over the years. It’s not that none of the plans worked. On a localized basis, or with a small group of individuals, people got trained and found jobs.

Story continues below advertisement

But none of these programs have been scaled up in a way that could truly move the needle on the dials that really matter: unemployment, underemployment and filling skills shortages.

The need for skills training has never been greater.

The pandemic offers the federal government a rare chance to build a rapid-response training program that addresses the needs of legions of Canadians whose careers have been disrupted by the lockdown.

Like some kind of science-fiction time warp, we’ve fast-forwarded through what would have been years of incremental change. Trends that were emerging are now staring us in the face.

Consider:

  • Careers are no longer linear. We’ve known that for some time, but the acceleration of automation and the overhaul of the service economy through the pandemic have created a critical need for mature learners to acquire new skills. The ability to quickly retrain and redeploy workers will be key to Canada’s success coming out of the other side of this unprecedented disruption.
  • Training has to be on-demand, meeting the learners where they are. Canada’s need for a more productive and resilient work force means helping people modernize their skills on an as-needed basis – literally 24/7. A successful training regime will identify the specific work-related skills of individuals who find themselves in transition and match them to appropriate retraining opportunities.
  • While the need for lifelong learning has long been known, little has been done to encourage mid-career Canadians to expand their skill sets to remain relevant. The complex interplay of motivation, navigation, time and money makes it challenging for older workers to return to classroom and lab-based learning. Participation is weakest among disadvantaged adults such as the low-skilled, unemployed or those in jobs with a high risk of automation. The pandemic has had a disproportionate impact on women, whose participation in the economic recovery is vital. Investments in employer-sponsored training remain low.

The way the current training system is designed and funded at the federal level won’t address these new realities.

While a welcome sign of the federal commitment to lifelong learning, the Canada Training Benefit (CTB) is virtually invisible to Canadians because it’s a refundable tax credit. Canadians must spend first, then claim the credit on their tax returns. Left unused, the benefit stands to grow over time, but there is currently no way for an individual to understand their account balance.

Story continues below advertisement

Further, employment insurance benefits are poorly suited to the kind of short-term training the CTB is meant to encourage. While Canadians could theoretically collect EI while in training, the service standard for receipt of benefits is 28 days, meaning most Canadians would not receive income support until after they returned to work.

Together, these elements put the financial onus of continuing education firmly on the shoulders of individuals. That needs to change.

Three changes can make the CTB, and the federal training regime, more responsive and provide the support so many Canadians desperately need.

First, the federal government should cover the direct costs of training by providing the first $500 as a tax-free training voucher. Canadians wouldn’t have to wait months to claim a tax credit. The government could provide a one-time boost for recipients of the Canada Emergency Response Benefit.

Second, the government should enhance the awareness and visibility of the CTB. An easy fix is to make the accumulated value of the benefit readily available and highly visible, perhaps through My Account on the Canada Revenue Agency portal.

Finally, the government should build a better real-time information and navigation hub to allow Canadians to know what skills are in demand and how to access short-cycle programs in their region. Vulnerable groups will be more likely to participate if they know where they can develop the skills that local employers need today.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada’s polytechnics stand ready to help. We’re a major pillar of the training infrastructure: collectively we offer nearly 17,000 short-cycle courses at an average cost of less than $500.

Polytechnics are already playing a significant role in helping Canadians sideswiped by the pandemic: industry-focused, drawing on expert faculty and countless courses in credentials ranging from apprenticeship programs to graduate certificates.

With a revamped CTB and more responsive training regime, we can do much, much more.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies