Skip to main content

John Beck is president and CEO of Aecon Group Inc.; Lu Jianzhong is president of CCCC International Holding Ltd. (CCCI).

While the federal government continues its review of the acquisition of Aecon Group Inc. by CCCC International Holding Ltd. (CCCI), the deal has been the subject of considerable media and political attention – including misleading and outright false claims.

As the principals in this transaction, we want to set the record straight.

Story continues below advertisement

The business case for the combination of our companies is beyond doubt, which is why the acquisition was unanimously approved by Aecon’s board, by Aecon shareholders (by 99.4 per cent of the votes cast), by Canada’s Competition Bureau and by Chinese regulators.

The deal will be of considerable benefit to Canada. It will lead to more high-quality jobs for Canadians in communities across the country, as Aecon will be in a much stronger position to compete with the many large foreign companies already operating in the country, but without a large on-the-ground presence.

This confidence is based not only on our assessment of the market and Aecon’s established strengths, but also on recent experience of Australia’s John Holland – which was acquired by CCCI in 2015 and is on track to double the size of its business within five years. John Holland continues to be led by an all-Australian leadership team, is hiring new Australian employees every month and increased its revenue by almost $1-billion last year, a rise of nearly 40 per cent. Its increased capacity and access to additional capital has helped it win several new infrastructure projects in Australia, including new rail tunnels under Sydney Harbour and construction of the country’s largest correctional facility. It has also opened a regional office for Southeast Asia and is part of a consortium that won the contract to build a new rapid transit line in Singapore.

John Holland’s experience follows a similar pattern to that of Houston-based Friede & Goldman (F&G), a world leader and innovator in offshore architecture and engineering serving the oil and gas industry, which joined CCCI in 2010. Since then, CCCI helped F&G to better leverage its existing competitive strengths and increase its revenue five-fold. Growth at John Holland and F&G came not from undercutting the market, but instead from combining CCCI’s global knowledge and financial capacity with local expertise to be a stronger partner for domestic firms, suppliers and clients.

Those are facts. They indicate the types of benefits that can accrue to Canada once the Aecon-CCCI deal is completed.

For reasons that have more to do with political opinion and the desire to limit competition, some opponents of the deal have made completely false claims about the nature of Aecon’s business and what may happen if it joins CCCI. Despite what they say, Aecon will continue to hire its work force in Canada and the business will continue to focus on the construction and maintenance of infrastructure – not the day-to-day operation of it. In the telecommunications sector, Aecon installs and pulls cable; it doesn’t build or operate telecom systems.

In the area of nuclear technology, Aecon holds no intellectual property, and the Candu reactors on which it works are already widely used in China with support from Canadian companies and the Canadian government. Furthermore, work on nuclear facilities is subject to security clearances at the individual employee level, regardless of the nationality of the contractor involved. Perhaps the wildest assumption of all is that Aecon’s employees would be complicit agents of a foreign government, which is a deep insult to the thousands of Canadian men and women who work on Aecon construction sites across Canada and the unions that represent them.

Story continues below advertisement

Opponents have also played fast and loose with the truth about CCCI’s ownership and left out important facts. For instance, although a state-owned enterprise, China Communications Construction Co. Ltd (CCCC) is publicly traded on both the Hong Kong and Shanghai stock exchanges and operates for the benefit of all its shareholders, which include some of the world’s largest institutional investors, such as Canada Pension Plan Investment Board, Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, Blackrock and Vanguard. As one of the world’s largest construction companies, CCCC has more than 118,000 employees (including 48,000 foreign employees) in more than 140 countries and regions. The company does not need Chinese government subsidies for its international activities. In fact – as the success in Australia and the United States have shown – CCCI leverages its business sense with the knowledge and expertise of local experts to drive growth and provide all stakeholders with a strong return on investment.

Regardless of all the myths, if this deal is approved, Aecon will continue to be run as it always has – led in Canada by Canadians and in full compliance with Canadian laws and regulations and an unblemished ethical track record. The difference is the company will be in a stronger position to grow along with Canada’s infrastructure market, create more jobs and, with its unionized work force, build more of the infrastructure we need to keep Canada’s economy moving.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter