Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

The pointy-heads at the Canada Revenue Agency have a strange sense of humour.

They kicked off tax filing season by telling Canadians they’ve made filing a return faster and easier this year. That must be why the CRA doubled the length of income tax returns from four to eight pages – in addition to all those fun and user-friendly schedules, worksheets and information forms, of course.

It’s nice to see the CRA taking our complaints about convoluted forms and guides to heart. “Our government is committed to modernizing the CRA and making sure it provides people-first service to Canadians,” Minister of National Revenue Diane Lebouthillier said in a recent statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Folks, it’s hard to know whether to laugh or cry. But if the Liberal government is serious about putting people first, the solution is simple: Make the CRA do our taxes for us.

It’s not a stretch. The CRA automatically receives information about the employment and investment income for most Canadians, so let its computers fill out the forms and do the math on our behalf for free. Numerous countries use such systems, so why not Canada?

‘Filing a paper return requires Grade 6 math and literacy skills, no more.’ Readers debate whether the Canada Revenue Agency should do our taxes for us

Some of us learned how to do our taxes in high school. But in recent years, filling out a paper return has become so complicated and stressful only a masochist would attempt it.

It’s unseemly because the CRA is effectively pushing people to pay third parties, typically software providers or professional tax preparers, fees to access their own money. (Yes, there’s free software but there’s generally no phone support if you get stuck, and incessant pushing to upgrade to paid versions.)

Consider this: 62 per cent of people who file tax returns are owed money from the government. The average refund was $1,740 last year. One would be hard-pressed to find a Canadian who doesn’t believe that every penny counts.

“I think there is value in the software, but it does raise the fundamental question of why anyone should actually have to pay anything to get their own money back,” said Jamie Golombek, managing director of tax and estate planning at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

“It would be wonderful to see a situation where effectively you get a prepopulated digital return, which has all your income and deductions that it [the CRA] knows about there. And you either sign off on it, ‘yes’ or ‘no,’ or add any additional lines that are relevant and then submit it. That would be the best-case scenario."

Story continues below advertisement

Already 36 countries, including Britain, Germany, Japan and the Netherlands, allow return-free tax filing for some taxpayers, according to the Tax Policy Center’s briefing book.

In Sweden, individuals receive a text message and simply reply “yes” or “no.” In Estonia, meanwhile, it takes the average person five minutes to file their return, according to The Atlantic.

Such systems spare many individuals the agony of preparing their own returns because there’s an assumption that all taxes on income are paid at source, Mr. Golombek said.

A hassle-free system could also exist in Canada since most people receive tax slips each year. Our employers and money managers automatically file that same income information to the CRA, meaning it’s redundant for Ottawa to expect individuals to prepare and file a return.

Already, the CRA does allow some people to autofill their returns as long as they have a registered account and are using NETFILE-certified software. But when I tried to register for an account numerous times this week, I kept getting a warning on my computer stating: “This site can’t provide a secure connection.” It’s not exactly a ringing endorsement.

The point remains, however, if the CRA can autofill returns for some Canadians, it should automatically do it for all of us. Individuals could then review and tweak their returns as required without incurring any costs.

Story continues below advertisement

At present, the only people the CRA are putting first are those in the tax-preparation industry, and they’re profiting handsomely off Ottawa’s confusion and decades-long push for people to file electronic returns.

Currently, almost 90 per cent of Canadians file their taxes electronically. It’s also estimated that Canadians spend $7-billion complying with the personal income tax system each year, according to the Fraser Institute.

No Canadian should have to incur out-of-pocket costs to file a return and get a refund. Paying taxes is painful enough.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies