Skip to main content

With rate hike a given, investors turn focus to Fed’s language on monetary policy

The U.S. Federal Reserve headquarters in Washington.

KEVIN LAMARQUE/Reuters

With the Federal Reserve virtually guaranteed to raise interest rates this week, investors are focused on how the U.S. central bank characterizes its monetary policy as borrowing costs return to more normal levels amid an ongoing economic expansion.

In what could be the most consequential rewrite of its policy statement in two-and-a-half years, the Fed may signal how close it is to stopping its rate-hike cycle, whether faster economic growth warrants ramping up the pace of tightening, and if it feels the era of loose money is, in effect, over.

The language in the Fed policy statement “is growing increasingly stale with each successive rate hike,” Goldman Sachs economists Spencer Hill and Jan Hatzius wrote ahead of the start on Tuesday of the central bank’s two-day policy meeting.

Story continues below advertisement

Hatzius predicted the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee will, at the least, drop language it has used since late 2015 that says rates would remain below historical levels “for some time” to come.

That small change would mark a broad acknowledgment that, nine years into the second-longest U.S. economic expansion on record, monetary policy and the economy in general are starting to look increasingly normal, both domestically and abroad.

The Fed’s current monetary policy tightening cycle began in December, 2015, and it has started trimming the massive portfolio of U.S. Treasury bonds and mortgage-backed securities that it bought to boost the economy after the 2007-09 recession.

The European Central Bank is expected later this week to outline its own plans to stop emergency asset purchases, highlighting Europe’s rebound from crisis.

Global growth has remained strong this year despite the risk of a global trade war and concerns about rising levels of sovereign debt.

Set against that backdrop, it makes little sense, say many analysts, for the Fed to keep promising to keep rates low as borrowing costs hit levels that are no longer considered low on a historic basis.

The Fed’s benchmark overnight lending rate, if lifted to a range of 1.75 per cent to 2 per cent this week, would be at a level comparable or above where it was from late 2001 to 2004, a period punctuated by the bursting of the technology bubble and the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks.

Story continues below advertisement

The Fed’s policy statement and fresh economic projections are due to be released at 2 p.m. EDT on Wednesday. Fed chairman Jerome Powell is scheduled to hold a news conference half an hour later.

“We see hawkish overtones from the decision to raise rates and our expectation that the statement will no longer say that the [federal] funds rate is likely to remain below the long-run neutral rate for some time,” Barclays analyst Michael Gapen wrote in a recent research note.

“As the [Federal Open Market Committee] closes in on neutral, we see it as less likely to make promises on the path of policy,” Mr. Gapen said, referring to the level at which monetary policy neither boosts nor slows the economy.

Futures contracts indicate a 96 per cent probability the fed funds rate will be raised a quarter of a percentage point on Wednesday, according to CME Group.

Fed policy makers’ updated forecasts will show whether they continue to expect only one additional rate increase over the rest of the year, or feel recent strong job and economic data justify a second one in the near term, and perhaps a boost to the number of rate hikes expected next year.

The U.S. central bank raised rates in March and policy makers say they expect two more upward moves before the end of the year. The Fed raised rates three times last year.

Story continues below advertisement

For several weeks, Fed officials have been indicating that changes to the statement may be in the works, though they have not been clear about the likely extent of them.

According to the minutes from the last policy meeting and policy makers’ statements since then, some Fed officials feel the fed funds rate is already at or near “neutral,” and therefore should no longer be described as “accommodative,” or directly encouraging investment and spending.

Analysts see such a shift as less likely at this point.

The last time such a change occurred was in September, 2005, when rates were raised from 3.50 per cent to 3.75 per cent, “into the range of [neutral]estimates” given by Fed staff at the time, Goldman Sachs analysts noted.

The phrase “policy remains accommodative” was merely removed, with no substitute language or explanation.

Currently, the core of Fed policy-makers feel the neutral rate is around 2.9 per cent – allowing leeway for perhaps three or four more rate increases – and some argue it may well be rising given the impact of the Trump administration’s tax cuts and other fiscal stimulus.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.