Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Barrick Gold Corp. is planning to sell its 50-per-cent share in the Kalgoorlie mine in Australia and has identified two Australian companies as possible buyers.

“There’s a lot of very interested parties in that asset, whether it’s Northern Star or Evolution [Mining]. Those mid-cap Aussie guys are doing extremely well," Barrick CEO Mark Bristow said in an interview after the release of the company’s second-quarter results on Monday.

Neither Northern Star nor Evolution responded to a request for comment.

Story continues below advertisement

After Barrick bought Randgold Resources Ltd. for US$6-billion earlier this year, the company said it intended to divest about US$1.5-billion in assets to concentrate on its highest-returning assets, such as its mines in Nevada and its massive Pueblo Viejo mine in the Dominican Republic, which needs about US$1-billion in capital expenditure over the next few years.

Kalgoorlie, in western Australia, is on track to produce about 270,000 ounces of gold this year. In the second quarter, its all-in sustaining cost was US$1,204 an ounce, making it among Barrick’s highest-cost mines. Barrick co-owns the asset alongside Nevada-based Newmont Goldcorp Corp., the world’s biggest gold producer. Newmont is the operator, meaning Barrick has little influence in running the mine. Mr. Bristow said Barrick would rather concentrate on assets over which it has full control rather than being a passive investor.

Barrick has also discussed selling its share of Kalgoorlie to Newmont, but Mr. Bristow said Newmont has indicated it intends to keep its options open. Newmont may end up selling its stake as well if an attractive offer materializes for 100 per cent of the asset, he added.

“We would consider transactions to consolidate or divest our interest in [Kalgoorlie] under the right valuation terms. Beyond that we are not able to speculate,” Newmont spokesman Omar Jabara wrote in an e-mail to The Globe and Mail on Monday.

Mr. Bristow also said on Monday that Barrick was prepared to sell its Massawa gold development project in Senegal or team up with another company to develop the site. As a demonstration of his faith in the asset, he said Barrick would be willing to take equity for Massawa if a buyer were to emerge. He named Toronto-based Teranga Gold Corp. and Australia-based Resolute Mining as parties that may be interested in “working with us” on Massawa.

“If Barrick ultimately decides to divest its assets in Senegal, we would take a look at it, as there could be operating synergies with our flagship Sabodala gold mine,” Teranga CEO Richard Young said in an e-mail to The Globe. “However, we would be very price sensitive given our current valuation.”

Resolute did not respond to a request for comment.

Story continues below advertisement

For the quarter ended June 30, Barrick reported a net profit of US$194-million, compared with a US$94-million loss in the same quarter in 2018. On an adjusted basis, the company reported earnings per share of US$0.09, in line with analysts’ expectations.

Last month, Barrick reached an agreement to acquire the 36.1 per cent of Acacia Mining PLC that it doesn’t already own for US$428-million, paving the way for an end to a geopolitical spat that had engulfed the London-based miner for more than two years.

In 2017, the Tanzanian government accused Acacia of US$200-billion in tax fraud and banned it from exporting gold concentrate, sidelining much of its production. In the aftermath, Tanzania refused to even negotiate with Acacia to end the fracas, with Barrick – as its biggest shareholder – leading the negotiations.

On Monday Mr. Bristow said there is still a “great deal of work to be done” to rebuild relations with local stakeholders in Tanzania, as Barrick tries to get a handle on Acacia’s operations. Barrick is also working to implement the terms of a previously announced tentative agreement to end the tax dispute. It plans to pay a US$300-million fine to Tanzania and has agreed to a profit-sharing plan with the Tanzanian government pertaining to Acacia’s three mines in the country. For now, though, Acacia’s operations remain idled for the most part.

Acacia announced on Monday that Tanzania has allowed it to resume gold shipments from its North Mara mine, but actual mining remains on hold after the site’s tailings dam was shut down in July following allegations of environmental breaches.

Your time is valuable. Have the Top Business Headlines newsletter conveniently delivered to your inbox in the morning or evening. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies