Skip to main content

Canada’s biggest oil and gas producer is pushing regulators to block deals it says expose the energy industry to billions of dollars in new liabilities, in an extraordinary bid to shield itself from a spike in cleanup costs.

Canadian Natural Resources Ltd. has raised objections this year to dozens of asset deals before the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) and pressed the watchdog to crack down on buyers with shaky finances, according to industry officials and company documents seen by The Globe and Mail.

The previously unreported interventions, some of which are detailed in confidential filings made to the AER, pit one of the sector’s most valuable companies against some of its smallest.

Story continues below advertisement

Companies caught up in the sweep include Just Freehold Energy Corp. and Gear Energy Ltd., which had sought to buy assets earlier this year. In some cases, startup companies with no track record of production have been targeted, the documents show, fuelling criticism that Canadian Natural is squelching competition.

A Canadian Natural spokeswoman would not answer detailed questions about the company’s actions.

The company, founded by billionaire financier Murray Edwards, has vast holdings across Western Canada and ranks among the largest contributors to an industry orphan-well fund established to cover costs of cleaning up and sealing old wells with no legal owner.

Payments to the industry fund are proportional to a company’s liabilities, meaning companies like Canadian Natural are on the hook for a larger share of reclamation costs.

Canadian Natural says the potential failure of buyers flagged in the documents it filed with the AER could saddle the entire industry with $2-billion in abandonment costs. It wants the buyers to post hefty deposits against that risk.

“From a high level you can kind of understand, [with] them being one of the larger companies and having to make larger deposits to the orphan-well fund,” said Ingram Gillmore, chief executive officer of Gear Energy, in an interview.

“But is that their role, or is it the role of the AER and other regulators to determine the rules, as opposed to letting [Canadian Natural] sort of push their way around and affect them?”

Story continues below advertisement

It is unclear whether any deals have been blocked as a result of Canadian Natural’s interventions. Gear’s acquisition of two facilities has since been approved, and the company has taken care to manage its liabilities, Mr. Gillmore said.

The objections by Canadian Natural nonetheless point to lingering concerns over the financial health of a major slice of Alberta’s biggest industry.

Rising crude prices have buoyed large oil sands companies, but producers focused on tapping natural gas deposits at shallow depths have been under extreme duress as prices for the heating fuel have plummeted.

That has sparked fears of further corporate failures in an industry and province already coping with a legacy of unfunded cleanup following a rash of bankruptcies through four years of an economic downturn spurred by plummeting oil prices.

Canadian Natural’s objections coincided with the sudden collapse earlier this year of Sequoia Resources Corp., a Chinese-controlled natural-gas producer that left in its wake hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of cleanup costs for which the AER is now on the hook.

Sequoia amassed thousands of wells and other infrastructure in a series of acquisitions over the last year-and-a-half, even though the company appeared to have insufficient financial resources – according to the AER’s own gauge for measuring a company’s assets against liabilities.

Story continues below advertisement

Canadian Natural had already questioned the validity of an October, 2017, deal in which a Sequoia affiliate paid a nominal sum to acquire high-liability assets from debt-saddled Pengrowth Energy Corp.

Now it’s suggesting a deeper fix is needed.

The energy regulator had introduced a more stringent solvency test for buyers of oil and gas assets in July, 2016, hoping to stem a rise in deals in which companies offloaded old properties, sometimes for as little as $1. The interim measure doubled the ratio of assets buyers must hold against their liabilities.

In documents filed last month, Canadian Natural says the system “significantly overstates” the financial well-being of the industry.

The AER assigns producers a liability management rating (LMR) that measures a company’s assets against the cost of cleaning and abandoning wells and other operations. The regulator says the LMR ratio for the industry is close to 5.

However, Canadian Natural puts the figure at under 2, based on what it says is a more current measure of industry profitability. It says deposits that companies are required to post against future cleanup costs should reflect their financial health, rather than industry averages.

Story continues below advertisement

A spokesperson for the regulator did not dispute Canadian Natural’s characterization but insisted the agency is applying closer scrutiny to proposed deals. It is also working with the provincial government on a review of the system, Cara Tobin said.

“We know that the LMR by itself is not a full indicator of a company’s financial health,” she said.

The industry is aware of Canadian Natural’s concerns, said Gary Leach, president of the Explorers and Producers Association of Canada. But he cautioned against overhauling regulations too quickly.

“It’s an appropriate time to look at it, but you also shouldn’t necessarily take hasty steps based on a moment in time of an industry that’s a century old and has many decades out in front of it,” he said.

orphan well problem growing

There are 1,785 orphan wells* in need of aban

donment plus another 1,062 sites in need of

reclamation as of April 2, 2018, according to the

Orphan Well Association (OWA). Those numbers

do not include the impact of recent bankruptcies

and are expected to rise.

ALBERTA

SASK.

Fort

McMurray

Edmonton

B.C.

Calgary

Legend

Orphan well

Reclamation site

Data points shown as of

February 2017

*An orphaned well is a well that has been investigated and

confirmed as not having any legally responsible or financially able

party to deal with its abandonment and reclamation.

Jeff lewis, JOHN SOPINSKi and murat yükselir/

THE GLOBE AND MAIL SOURCE: orphan well association

via boe report; qgis

orphan well problem growing

There are 1,785 orphan wells* in need of abandonment plus another 1,062 sites in need of reclamation as of April 2, 2018, according to the Orphan Well Association (OWA). Those numbers do not include the impact of recent bankruptcies and are expected to rise.

B.C.

ALBERTA

SASK.

Fort

McMurray

Edmonton

Calgary

Legend

Orphan well

Data points

shown as of

February 2017

Reclamation site

*An orphaned well is a well that has been investigated and confirmed as not

having any legally responsible or financially able party to deal with its

abandonment and reclamation.

Jeff lewis, JOHN SOPINSKi and murat yükselir/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

SOURCE: orphan well association via boe report; qgis

orphan well problem growing in alberta

There are 1,785 orphan wells* in need of abandonment plus another 1,062

sites in need of reclamation as of April 2, 2018, according to the Orphan

Well Association (OWA). Those numbers do not include the impact of

recent bankruptcies and are expected to rise.

B.C.

ALBERTA

SASK.

Fort

McMurray

Edmonton

Calgary

Legend

Orphan well

Note: Data points

shown as of

February 2017

Reclamation site

*An orphaned well is a well that has been investigated and confirmed as not having any

legally responsible or financially able party to deal with its abandonment and reclamation.

Jeff lewis, JOHN SOPINSKi and murat yükselir/THE GLOBE AND MAIL

SOURCE: orphan well association via boe report; qgis

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter