Skip to main content

Energy and Resources New $1.6-billion Liberty Pipeline proposed to move oil out of North Dakota

Two companies are proposing a US$1.6-billion pipeline to move North Dakota crude oil, making it the biggest such project to move oil out of the state since the Dakota Access pipeline that sparked violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement in 2016 and 2017.

Houston-based Phillips 66 and Casper, Wyo.-based Bridger Pipeline announced the joint venture called Liberty Pipeline on Monday. It’s designed to move 350,000 barrels of oil daily – the bulk of which from western North Dakota’s oilpatch – to the country’s biggest storage terminal in Cushing, Okla. From there, the companies said shippers can access multiple Gulf Coast destinations.

The exact route of the 60-centimetre diameter pipeline has not been disclosed, although the companies said in a statement the project “will utilize existing pipeline and utility corridors and advanced construction techniques to limit environmental and community impact.”

Story continues below advertisement

The pipeline would start in Guernsey, Wyo., and end in Cushing, Okla., Bridger Pipeline spokesman Bill Salvin said.

A separate 88.5-kilometre, 40cm North Dakota line would run through the west-central part of the state, travel south though Montana and connect with the Liberty Pipeline at Guernsey, Mr. Salvin said.

Forty-four miles of the North Dakota portion would run parallel to an existing pipeline corridor, he said.

As described, the pipeline would be west of the Dakota Access pipeline and far from the most productive portion of North Dakota’s oilpatch in the northwestern part of the state.

“Pipelines are a matter of great concern to folks,” Mr. Salvin said. “We are acutely aware of pipeline routing in North Dakota and we are doing everything in our power to use existing pipeline rights of way and corridors.”

“Importantly, the new line will not cross any tribal lands,” he said.

Phillips 66 spokesman Dennis Nuss gave little detail about the pipeline other than to say it would not “originate in North Dakota.”

Story continues below advertisement

“The project hasn’t been finalized – there are still some things being worked on,” he said. “We will leverage existing pipelines and infrastructure facilities where possible.”

North Dakota’s Public Service Commission must approve the pipeline’s route in the state. Spokeswoman Stacy Eberl said the agency has not seen any plans from the companies, which said in their statement they hope to have the pipeline operational in the first quarter of 2021.

“The route will have to be determined before they apply to us because we approve the route,” Ms. Eberl said Tuesday. “Nothing has been filed with us at all.”

The companies’ statement said they plan to begin booking shipping commitments from suppliers “at a later date.”

North Dakota is the country’s second-biggest oil producer behind Texas. The state’s oil production is pegged at 1.4 million barrels a day.

The US$3.8-billion Dakota Access oil pipeline, which has the capacity to move about half of the oil produced daily in North Dakota, has been moving North Dakota oil through South Dakota and Iowa to a shipping point in Illinois since June 2017.

Story continues below advertisement

Native American tribes and other groups that feared environmental harm from the pipeline staged large protests that resulted in more than 760 arrests in southern North Dakota over a six-month span beginning in late 2016.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter