Skip to main content

Why are Lebanon’s commercial broadcasters smiling? It’s because they can charge candidates the price of a BMW or small apartment to appear on TV.

The election Sunday was Lebanon’s first parliamentary vote since 2009 and the half dozen or so commercial broadcasters are doing their best to both promote and hinder democracy by reportedly charging candidates as much as US$250,000 for a long, prime-time appearance.

While democracy is served because the candidates get their faces in front of voters, the reality is that only candidates who can afford the outrageous TV prices are the ones who are independently wealthy, have wealthy patrons or are heavily subsidized by the big-name parties that want to keep their lock on parliament.

Story continues below advertisement

Several candidates told The Globe and Mail that payments to broadcasters were perfectly routine and sadly legal. Kholoud Wattar Kassem, an independent female candidate in the Beruit 2 (West Beirut) voting district, the single largest in the country, said she could not afford to get on TV during the campaign. “Most of us can’t find that kind of money,” she said. “We would need US$2-million to run a high-profile campaign.”

Lebanon’s Daily Star newspaper reported on Saturday that commercial broadcasters have been charging candidates “upward of US$6,000 per minute of airtime – between US$150,000 and US$250,000 per interview – with the result that wealthier, traditional politicians will have a better chance of reaching voters.”

Radio stations also charge candidates for exposure, though at much cheaper rates than those charged by the TV stations.

An Ipsos poll revealed that half of voters still rely on TV for their primary source of news. Unwealthy candidates, however, are not entirely shut out of the media-exposure game. In the past Lebanese election, nine years ago, social media was almost entirely absent. Today, most candidates, especially the younger ones, are using Facebook, Twitter and other sites to try to recruit voters.

Lebanon’s commercial broadcasters, most of which are loyal to, and financed by, individual political parties, are required by law to identify sponsored media appearances and reveal who paid for them. In practice, the broadcasters do not fully meet their reporting commitments to Lebanon’s electoral commission, according to local media reports.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter