Skip to main content

The aviation industry is bracing for double-digit insurance premium hikes for the first time in about 15 years, as insurers wrestle with higher costs from aircraft groundings, including the grounding of Boeing Co.’s 737 Max jets after two fatal crashes, insurance executives said this week.

Aviation industry premiums have been creeping up since 2017 as companies renew their contracts, in the aftermath of costly plane and helicopter groundings, executives said on the sidelines of a Montreal conference on aviation and products liability.

The grounding of Boeing’s 737 Max has put further pressure on rates, even as underwriters try to tighten insurance contract language governing groundings.

Story continues below advertisement

“We have been seeing gradual growth in rates over the last year to two years, but the level of increases has certainly picked up since the Max losses,” Global Aerospace executive Simon Abbott said at the Aircraft Builders Council conference. “The single-digit increases of last year have become very definitely double-digit this year.”

Global Aerospace, a joint venture of two of the world’s largest reinsurers, Munich Re Group and Berkshire Hathaway Inc., was the lead insurer on Boeing.

“There is plenty of evidence of double-digit hikes,” said another industry source who was not authorized to speak publicly about the matter.

It is not clear whether companies such as airlines are passing on the costs of higher premiums to passengers. Airlines’ trade group International Air Transport Association (IATA) declined to comment.

According to a July report in Insurance Insider, Global Aerospace was able to secure a 59-per-cent rate hike from Indonesian carrier Lion Air, which operated one of the two Max jets that crashed. The crashes led to the jet’s March grounding over an anti-stall system.

Global Aerospace declined to comment on the report, while Lion Air was not immediately available for comment.

In addition to claims stemming from the crashes, insurers face claims from interruption to airlines’ businesses during the grounding, which Boeing expects to end early next quarter.

Story continues below advertisement

While insurers would help cover airlines’ grounding costs, along with lawsuits from families, Boeing could still be on the hook.

Boeing had a policy totalling over US$2-billion including a sublimit of US$500-million for grounding, industry sources say. Boeing declined comment.

Industry executives have said insured losses after the Max grounding would be the highest for aviation insurers since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States.

Global insurers incurred a total of US$47.1-billion in losses from the Sept. 11 attacks, including US$5.2-billion in aviation liability losses, according to the industry-funded Insurance Information Institute. While the Sept. 11 attacks drove premiums up, rates softened in subsequent years, executives said.

Price increases are not uniform, with smaller and medium-sized aerospace suppliers seeing only modest increases.

Bob Crawford, board president of the Aircraft Builders Council, which provides aviation products liability insurance, and fellow board member David McClain, said they have heard underwriters are proposing to both clarify and tighten contract language on aircraft groundings in the wake of the Max crashes, although it is not yet clear how.

Story continues below advertisement

“The biggest key on grounding tends to be what triggers the coverage,” Mr. McClain said. “But it leaves a lot of gray area for companies who say ground their own aircraft for safety problems that arise.”

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter