Skip to main content

International Business China’s big three airlines seek Boeing compensation over 737 MAX grounding

A Boeing 737 MAX 8 aircraft of Air China sits on the tarmac at an airport in Beijing, China March 11, 2019. REUTERS/Stringer/Files

CHINA STRINGER NETWORK/Reuters

China’s three biggest airlines have asked U.S. plane maker Boeing Co. to compensate them for losses caused by the grounding and delayed deliveries of 737 MAX jets, just as regulators gather to discuss design changes for the troubled aircraft.

The triple compensation requests come at a sensitive time in Sino-U.S. relations, with a string of tit-for-tat import tariffs culminating in Washington accusing Beijing of backtracking on almost all aspects of a proposed trade deal.

The U.S. administration’s latest tariff increase on US$200-billion worth of Chinese imports – and hints of more – has prompted fear that China could retaliate against U.S. companies.

Story continues below advertisement

On Wednesday, Air China Ltd. and China Southern Airlines Co. Ltd. told Reuters the pair have added their voices to a compensation request from China Eastern Airlines Corp. Ltd. announced a day earlier.

The latest requests were first reported by Chinese state TV.

China was the first country to ground the 737 MAX two months ago after a crash in Ethiopia killed 157 people in March, in the second such incident for Boeing’s newest aircraft.

“China has grounded 96 aircraft, which is about 4 per cent of its airplanes. The grounding causes huge losses for Chinese airlines,” China aviation expert Li Xiaojin told Reuters.

Daily losses are likely to be at least 100,000 yuan (approximately $19,442) per aircraft for each airline, Mr. Li estimated.

“The potential costs are huge, too. Slower growth in passenger volume across China’s major airports for March and April was largely due to the grounding of 737 MAX jets, according to my calculations,” Mr. Li said.

China’s state-asset regulator put the number of 737 MAX jets operated by the three biggest Chinese carriers at 53.

Story continues below advertisement

Outside of China, carriers that have requested compensation include Turkish Airlines, United Airlines, Ryanair and flydubai.

Bloomberg last week reported the big Chinese airlines were considering teaming up to seek compensation. On Tuesday, state newspaper People’s Daily said China Eastern had not communicated with the other carriers on the topic before making its request. China Eastern confirmed the content of that report to Reuters.

On Wednesday, however, widely read tabloid Global Times reported that the action appeared to be a “concerted effort.”

“China seems to be ready now to put more pressure on Boeing as the company happens to have a genuine safety issue, and the trade friction between the U.S. and China started to go into a downward spiral,” Global Times quoted Shen Yuxin, a partner at law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, as saying.

The latest compensation requests also come a day before the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration plays host to global regulators in Dallas to review 737 MAX software and training proposals from Boeing before regulators decide whether to end the grounding.

China and the European Union each have their own aerospace industries and so are likely to determine their own conditions for allowing 737 MAX flights to resume, analysts said.

Story continues below advertisement

The International Air Transport Association has also convened a meeting of airlines with grounded 737 MAX jets on Thursday in Montreal.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter