Skip to main content

France and the United States failed on Wednesday to agree how to push forward a global rewrite of decades-old cross-border tax rules though they agreed to set aside a bilateral row on digital taxation, France’s finance minister said on Wednesday.

Governments from nearly 140 countries aim to give their backing to pursue what would be the biggest overhaul of international tax rules since the 1920s at the end of the month at the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

But preparations led in part by France and the United States have been eclipsed by a bilateral dispute between the two with Washington threatening retaliatory tariffs against Paris’ own national tax on big tech companies that book out-sized profits on French income despite minimal physical presence.

Story continues below advertisement

The United States has further complicated the backdrop for a global deal by proposing last month that the future rules should be optional for companies.

Calling a truce until the end of the year, French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire said he had agreed with U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin in Davos that France would not require companies to pay its digital tax this year and that Mnuchin had agreed to suspend the tariff threat in the mean time.

Le Maire added: “The U.S. and France committed themselves to work on a global international solution on digital taxation and international taxation.”

“But we still need to have a clear understanding of what will be the working basis at the OECD and we want this basis to be solid, credible and fair.”

He said that the future tax rules could not be credible if they were optional for companies and said he would meet again with Mnuchin on Thursday to discuss the issue.

Related topics

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies