Skip to main content

The National NewsMedia Council has dismissed four parts of a complaint against The Globe and Mail by Bombardier Inc. for an investigative report that revealed the company’s role in a controversial Russian railroad along Ukraine’s border.

The subject of the article was the “Ukraine Bypass,” a railway along the border of Russia and Ukraine that has diplomatic and military implications in the volatile region.

The complaint was made by Mike Nadolski, vice-president of public relations for Bombardier.

Story continues below advertisement

The Council found against Mr. Nadolski on four complaints, including the most serious of bias. It upheld two points in favour of Mr. Nadolski.

The first part upheld was a complaint over the plural use of the word “critics.”

Mr. Nadolski contended there was only one named critic in the story and that the plural use of critics was misleading. In its defence, The Globe said there were others who were not named in this investigation and that the other named person in the article, a military analyst, was also a critic. The Council disagreed.

The Council also upheld a second complaint by Mr. Nadolski, who contended the article rested on “whether Bombardier’s involvement with the rail project complied with the sanctions and policies enacted by the Canadian government, and that the news organization should have clearly reported on this easily verifiable fact.”

The Globe acknowledged international sanctions are complex legal terrain. Bombardier and its lawyers said the project is compliant. The article says so and attributes this to the company, because sanctions are, for the vast majority of transactions, self-enforcing.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter