Unilever UL-N will cut about 1,500 management jobs and reshape its business to focus on five main product areas as it tries to boost growth after a failed acquisition and with an activist investor to appease.
The maker of Dove soap and Magnum ice cream, which employs about 149,000 people worldwide, said on Tuesday it would focus on beauty and wellbeing, personal care, home care, nutrition, and ice cream.
The move, which Unilever said had been in the works for a year, echoes the reshaping by rival Procter & Gamble (P&G) PG-N three years ago - which at the time also had activist investor Nelson Peltz’s Trian Partners as a shareholder.
“Moving to five category-focused business groups will enable us to be more responsive to consumer and channel trends, with crystal-clear accountability for delivery,” Unilever CEO Alan Jope said.
Unilever, whose shares have fallen by about a quarter from their record high in 2019, last week effectively abandoned plans to buy GlaxoSmithKline’s GSK-N consumer healthcare business for 50 billion pounds ($67 billion).
Its proposal, rejected by GSK, was widely criticised by investors as being a costly and risky distraction from dealing with pressing challenges to the business, such as surging inflation in emerging markets and weakness in healthy foods.
Days later, reports also emerged activist investor Nelson Peltz’s Trian Partners had been building a stake in Unilever, mirroring a previous investment and push for change at P&G and other consumer goods companies. Trian has not confirmed a stake in Unilever.
At P&G, Trian sought to improve the Tide detergent maker’s shrinking market share, low organic sales growth, aging brands, bureaucracy and excessive structural costs, among other things. Peltz also pushed for P&G’s decision to restructure its business into fewer units - similar to Unilever’s new plan.
Since Trian first invested in P&G, the company’s stock price nearly doubled, and bankers and lawyers who have worked with Peltz expect he may bring the playbook that worked at P&G to Unilever.
However, there may be no quick fix.
“Unilever operates in different product categories so it is unclear if this same strategy is enough to get growth back and over what time scale. Typically this takes years rather than months,” Tineke Frikkee, fund manager at Unilever investor Waverton Investment Management, said.
Unilever, which is expected by analysts to next month report a decline in full-year net income, has struggled through the pandemic with rising raw material, labour and transport costs. Its exposure to certain foods and emerging markets - where inflation is rising sharply - has also put it at a disadvantage versus rivals P&G and Nestle.
As Unilever continues to lag, investors have grown frustrated. On Thursday, British fund manager Terry Smith criticised the company in a letter to his Fundsmith LLP investors, calling the lost GSK deal a “near death experience” and urging management to focus on strengthening performance.
“Unilever management’s response to its poor performance has been to utter meaningless platitudes to which it has now attempted to add major M&A activity,” Smith wrote.
GlobalData analyst Ramsey Baghdadi said Unilever would do better to focus on strengthening its current product ranges and reaching new customers, instead of diversifying into other sectors such as healthcare - as seen in the GSK bid.
Unilever, which traces its roots to a small soap business in 1880s Britain, said it did not expect factory workers to be impacted by its restructuring. There will be 15% fewer senior management roles and 5% fewer junior management roles, however.
“While today’s news may not be directly connected to the company’s failed GSK offer, the timing is unfortunate,” Sean Moran, restructuring specialist at law firm Shakespeare Martineau, said. “When confidence in a business is low, drastic decisions must often be made.”
Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.