Skip to main content

International Business At G7, a united plan for global growth isn’t even on the table

As the leaders of the Group of Seven face the challenge of reaching consensus on a road map for global growth, the summit in France remains overshadowed by discord and geopolitical tensions that extend outside this cohort of the world’s wealthiest democracies.

U.S. President Donald Trump continued to trade barbs with China on tariffs on the weekend, adding weight to concerns the global economy is teetering on the edge of a recession aggravated by the trade war. Britain’s impending departure from the European Union on terms yet undecided and Mr. Trump’s threats to escalate trade tensions with Europe further suggest that consensus among the group is unlikely – an outcome the global economy doesn’t need.

This was the case at last year’s summit in Canada, where leaders wrestled over a final joint statement, only to have Mr. Trump repudiate his signature shortly after leaving the summit and tweet criticism of the host, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.

Story continues below advertisement

This year’s host, French President Emmanuel Macron, has indicated he will avoid that possibility by simply not having a statement. Instead, Mr. Macron may issue his own careful summary of what was discussed.

Even if the leaders, who discussed the economy Sunday morning, issue a final statement, it’s unlikely to contain a solution to what’s deterring investment and dampening business confidence. During Sunday’s meeting on the economy, Mr. Trump and the others basically stated their contrasting positions on trade. EU officials pointed out the impact of trade tensions on the global economy and their support for dealing with China within multilateral institutions while Mr. Trump restated his U.S. vs. China approach.

On Friday, China unveiled retaliatory tariffs on US$75-billion worth of U.S. goods, prompting Mr. Trump to respond with increases to planned tariffs on US$550-billion of Chinese goods and an order for U.S. firms to pull out of China.

In some ways the global economy is doing fairly well at the moment, with unemployment low in major economies. Yet, world trade and industrial investment and production have slowed sharply – and those are the forces that could carry forward the decade-long economic expansion since the Great Recession.

By imposing tariffs, or import taxes, on Chinese goods, and by threatening to impose new ones on European autos and even French wine, Mr. Trump has sown uncertainty among businesses about their supply chains – the paths that raw materials, parts and goods take as they move through the globalized economy. Markets have become volatile, dropping sharply last week after the U.S. and China exchanged more tariffs.

Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Berenberg Bank in London, says that while the direct damage from the tariffs is so far limited, the lack of clarity over terms of trade is corroding confidence.

“Entrepreneurs and firms only invest when they feel confident about the outlook,” he said. “The pervasive uncertainty about the future of global trade and the resulting need to restructure cross-border supply chains weighs heavily on industrial sentiment and investment.”

Story continues below advertisement

Business, he said, is driven by “animal spirits” – a term coined by 20th-century British economist John Maynard Keynes to describe the optimism needed to take risks and invest.

Mr. Trump’s unpredictable America-first economic nationalism is upending decades of rules-based economic co-operation rooted in global institutions like the World Trade Organization and the Group of Seven itself.

Space for action is increasingly limited, and not just by Mr. Trump’s disruption.

The U.S. Federal Reserve has little room to lower interest rates, and the European Central Bank’s even less, with its key benchmarks at or below zero. They could resume stimulus programs that include buying bonds to lower borrowing rates. But borrowing rates are already extremely low.

Many governments still have debt hangovers from the global financial crisis, leaving less room for spending to stimulate investment and consumption. Germany has been running a surplus and has balked at taking on new debt to spend on things that could raise growth, such as roads and bridges and high-speed internet coverage for the whole country.

China’s growth has slowed from its previous red-hot pace, which often happens when an emerging economy starts to catch up with the rest of the world. Aging populations in many developed economies will strain tax revenues and lower consumption.

Story continues below advertisement

Rock-bottom borrowing costs have led to calls for governments to borrow and spend more to take up where central banks have run short of ammunition. But so far, large spending initiatives are absent. Some US$16-trillion in government bonds are showing negative yields, meaning investors are willing to pay for the privilege of lending to governments. High prices for bonds – which move opposite to yields – mean investors are more than willing to lend to governments at cheap rates.

“The tone of these messages from the G7 will provide a signal about the prospects for upcoming negotiations,” Mr. Schmieding said. “It would count as a success if – against the odds – the G7 leaders were to emphasize areas of co-operation instead of just setting out their differences individually. In the end, Trump’s tweets afterwards may move markets more than anything at the summit itself.”

Editor’s note: (Aug.26, 2019) Correction: An earlier version of this article incorrectly described Emmanuel Macron as French Prime Minister, when he is the President.
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter