Skip to main content

Employees work at a Dongfeng Peugeot Citroen factory in Chengdu, China, on Sept. 6, 2016.

China Daily CDIC/Reuters

Fiat Chrysler and Peugeot owner PSA’s merger is unlikely to provide a quick fix to their problems in China, as both companies have long struggled to find the right products at the right price for the world’s top car market, analysts say.

The companies said on Thursday they aimed to reach a binding deal in the coming weeks to create the world’s fourth-biggest automaker by production volume.

But scale alone will not make Italian-American Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) and France’s PSA Group more competitive in a market where they have been slow to adapt to trends and win over consumers, leading their sales to lag far behind foreign rivals such as Volkswagen and General Motors .

Story continues below advertisement

PSA does not have enough competitive SUV models, and neither company has enough electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles, or enough cars packed with hi-tech features for Chinese tastes, analysts say.

In a market where 28 million cars were bought in 2018, FCA sold just 155,215, while PSA sold 257,723, according to consultancy LMC Automotive. At the end of September, FCA had a market share of 0.5 per cent in China’s passenger car market, while PSA’s was 0.6 per cent.

Analysts say they have been squeezed by Japanese and local brands, which have product line-ups better suited to Chinese tastes at cheaper prices.

“Both companies are very home-market centred and have failed to adapt to shifts in Chinese market preferences,” said Bill Russo, head of Shanghai-based consultancy Automobility Ltd. and a former senior Asia-based Chrysler executive.

“Neither company has recognized and delivered on the trends of shared, connected and electric vehicles,” Russo said.

That makes them ill-prepared to deal with further shifts in the Chinese market, which saw annual sales contract for the first time since the 1990s last year and is expected to see another drop this year.

“China’s overall market is experiencing a [transition] and adjustment period,” said Alan Kang, a Shanghai-based senior analyst at LMC Automotive. “It is very hard for these two companies, which do not have enough competitive up-to-date products, to quickly recover with the merger.”

Story continues below advertisement

FCA has a partnership in China with Guangzhou Automobile Group, which said on Thursday it backed the merger.

PSA has been trying to reboot its operations in China. In September, it said it had hammered out a plan with its Chinese partner Dongfeng Group to restructure their joint venture, slashing costs in the short term and aiming to boost annual sales to 400,000 vehicles by 2025.

A document seen by Reuters in July showed the joint venture planned to halve its workforce and drop two of four shared assembly plants in China.

It was not immediately clear whether FCA and PSA’s merger would affect that restructuring. Dongfeng Group also holds a 12.2-per-cent equity stake and 19.5-per cent-voting stake in PSA.

One banking source told Reuters Dongfeng would be able to sell its stakes, which could help ease the deal’s passage through U.S. regulators, given U.S.-Chinese trade tensions.

Dongfeng declined to comment on FCA and PSA’s merger plan.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies