Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Andrew Bailey speaks at a press conference at the Bank of England in London on Feb. 25, 2019.

POOL/Reuters

Britain should not submit to the European Union’s financial services rules just to get better access to the bloc’s market after Brexit, Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey said on Wednesday.

European daily share trading worth 6 billion euros ($7.36 billion) left the City of London for the continent this week in the first tangible sign of Brexit’s impact on Britain’s 130 billion-pound ($176 billion) finance industry.

Bailey said Britain must not become a mere “taker” of EU rules in return for access.

Story continues below advertisement

“If the price of this is too high then we can’t just go for it whatever,” he told parliament’s Treasury Committee.

“I strongly recommend that we don’t become a rule-taker. If the price of that is no equivalence ... then I am afraid that will follow.”

Britain left the EU’s single market last week and its new trade deal with the bloc does not cover financial market access.

Britain and the EU are committed to agreeing a memorandum of understanding by the end of March on cooperation in financial rules to unlock equivalence-based access.

The EU has asked Britain about its intentions to diverge from the bloc’s rules, which could make it harder for Brussels to grant equivalence-based direct access for the City of London.

Leaving the EU has given Britain the chance to drop rules it had to follow until now.

Bailey said Britain would not introduce a new EU rule that allows banks to deduct the value of software investments from capital requirements.

Story continues below advertisement

BoE Deputy Governor Sam Woods said solvency rules for insurers also needed to be reformed.

OPEN MARKETS

Bailey said the EU’s drive to be more self-sufficient in financial services was shaping its decisions on equivalence.

“The question is: are they going to do it? Is this the time when they do it? Because it hasn’t happened to date in many areas,” he said.

Bailey said equivalence should be based on Britain having regulation that achieves similar outcomes to that in the EU, rather than following it to the letter, something the EU has not required for other jurisdictions.

He said the EU’s broader approach to financial services trade with Britain appeared focused on boosting some less competitive financial businesses in the euro zone, rather than seeking the best value financial services for businesses.

“I fail to see why people would want to close themselves off from open markets,” Bailey said.

Story continues below advertisement

Bailey said between 5,000 and 7,000 financial services jobs had already left Britain for the EU - fewer than some forecasters had feared, though the process was not over.

He had warned in December of potential Brexit disruption in markets such as the relocation in euro stock and derivatives trading which has fragmented markets.

But he said the markets had been very stable. “The markets were broadly expecting what they got,” he said.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies