Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

A sign for Just Eat, a food delivery service, hangs outside a restaurant in London.

BEN STANSALL/AFP/Getty Images

Dutch internet conglomerate Prosus made an unsolicited $6.3 billion cash bid to buy British food delivery firm Just Eat on Tuesday, using its superior firepower to try to scupper an all-share offer from rival Takeaway.com.

The offer is the first major move by chief executive Bob van Dijk since South Africa’s Naspers spun out the company last month, creating a European tech firm valued at $120 billion, largely due to its 31 per cent stake in China’s Tencent.

Van Dijk said the all-cash 710 pence-a-share offer was worth 4.9 billion pounds ($6.34 billion), a 20 per cent premium to Takeaway’s offer based on the Monday closing price of its shares.

Story continues below advertisement

Takeaway and Just Eat agreed the terms of a merger in August that would create one of the biggest food delivery groups outside China, with leadership in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands and Canada.

A slide in the value of Takeaway’s shares, however, has reduced the value of its bid from an original 731 pence a share to 594 pence.

Just Eat said its board had unanimously rejected the Prosus offer, which “significantly undervalued” its assets and prospects, both as a stand-alone company and in combination with Takeaway.

Prosus’ Van Dijk said he went public to give Just Eat’s shareholders the opportunity to consider a higher bid.

“We don’t believe we’re going hostile,” he said. “We haven’t been able to agree on a proposal, but we believe that shareholders will find this offer attractive.”

He said the companies had some overlap in Brazil, where both are shareholders in iFood, and that Prosus had the financial resources needed to invest and grow Just Eat’s business.

Just Eat said it stood by the deal it agreed with Takeaway, saying that was based on “compelling strategic rationale.”

Story continues below advertisement

It said it had engaged with Prosus and rejected several lower offers before Prosus went public on Tuesday.

Takeaway also said its bid was superior.

“We think our bid is better as it gives shareholders of Just Eat the opportunity to benefit from the advantages of our merger,” a spokesman told Reuters. “We also offer shareholders more certainty.”

DELIVERY WAR

Analysts said a bidding war for Just Eat between the two Dutch-based suitors now loomed.

That was “always a strong possibility, given the increasingly lowball offer from Takeaway.com,” Neil Wilson of Markets.com said. “A bidding war is now on. You may need more like 750 pence to sort this out.”

Takeaway.com shares rebounded 4.4 per cent to 74.05 euros on Tuesday, while Just Eat shares soared 25 per cent to 735 pence, above Prosus’ offer price.

Story continues below advertisement

“The Prosus offer is in many ways very cheeky and even more lowball,” Wilson said, noting it was still below Takeaway’s initial bid and could force the firm to raise its offer “as it looks in a weakened position due to the stock’s decline.”

Prosus traded just 0.4 per cent higher on the news.

The firm already owns stakes in various food delivery services globally, including Delivery Hero, iFood and India’s Swiggy.

Just Eat however said the Takeaway deal would enable its shareholders to remain invested in the combined group, which would benefit from a strong leadership position in many major markets.

But the terms of the deal have not convinced all of Just Eat’s investors, with several top 10 shareholders, including Aberdeen Standard Investments and Eminence Capital, saying they will oppose Takeway.com’s offer.

Meetings to vote on the Just Eat-Takeaway deal are due to be held on December 4.

Story continues below advertisement

Analysts at Barclays said they were surprised by the move by Prosus, which they had expected to become an investor in a combined Just Eat-Takeaway.

They said Just Eat shareholders were better served by the Takeaway offer than the Prosus bid as they both stood, but that could change if Prosus were to offer towards 800 pence.

“From a Prosus equity standpoint, this signals their intention to invest big in food delivery... but we think there are some questions on their ability to add value to Just Eat versus what Takeaway.com can,” they said.

Cat Rock, a major shareholder in both Just Eat and Takeaway which had pushed for the two to combine, said Prosus’s offer “dramatically undervalued” Just Eat’s shares.

Prosus should pay at least five times Just Eat’s 2020 revenue, translating to a cash offer of at least 925 pence a share, Cat Rock said.

Just Eat has seen its earnings momentum slow as it has boosted investment in an increasingly competitive market, putting pressure on the company to combine with a rival.

Story continues below advertisement

Founded in Denmark in 2000, the company grew by building an online marketplace for independent take-aways, typically offering Indian or Chinese food.

Facing increased competition from food delivery companies like Uber Eats and Deliveroo, it has increasingly partnered chain restaurants such as KFC and Wagamama and has rolled out its own delivery services.

It said on Monday rapid growth in delivery and demand for broader cuisine were helping counter slower growth in its traditional marketplace in Britain.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies