Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Citigroup on Wednesday reported a surge in quarterly profit that exceeded estimates.

Athit Perawongmetha/Reuters

Citigroup Inc on Wednesday reported a surge in quarterly profit that swept past estimates, fuelled by the bank’s decision to release loan loss reserves that helped offset a plunge in revenue from lower trading and credit card lending.

The bank took down $2.4-billion of funds it had set aside during the COVID-19 pandemic for expected losses that have not yet materialized. A year ago, it had added $5.9-billion to its loss reserves.

An economic recovery fuelled by vaccine rollouts across the country and a $1.9-trillion stimulus package pushed through by the Biden administration earlier this year has brightened the outlook for Wall Street’s biggest banks, with all of them freeing up funds set aside during the height of the pandemic.

Story continues below advertisement

“The pace of the global recovery is exceeding earlier expectations and with it, consumer and corporate confidence is rising,” said Chief Executive Officer Jane Fraser.

While the latest results from the banks clearly indicate that a recovery is under way, it may not immediately translate into blockbuster profits because of low interest rates, weak loan demand and a big slowdown in trading activity, analysts have said.

Citigroup has also struggled to offset the drag from the credit card businesses where customers cut back on spending and paid off their loans during the pandemic, unlike larger and more diversified rivals JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America .

There were, however, positive signs during the quarter, as consumer spending rebounded. Spending on Citi credit cards in the United States jumped 40 per cent from a year earlier.

Chief Financial Officer Mark Mason said the bank expects more customers to go back to their pre-pandemic ways of carrying revolving balances and paying interest to Citigroup as government stimulus payments wind down later this year.

Results were also helped by investment banking, with revenues rising slightly to $1.8-billion, as dealmakers capitalized on a record M&A boom. Advisory fees for deals surged 77 per cent.

Equity underwriting revenue rose 11 per cent, helped by higher fees from underwriting initial public offerings and special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs). Debt underwriting revenue, however, declined 21 per cent.

Story continues below advertisement

“On a clean, core economic earnings basis (i.e., core preprovision earnings minus net charge-offs), results actually bettered expectations at $1.86/share. The beat came primarily from better-than-expected credit quality,” said Oppenheimer analyst Chris Kotowski in a note to clients.

Citi’s shares were trading flat after rising as much as 3 per cent.

TRADING TAKES A HIT

For the quarter ended June 30, net income jumped to $6.19-billion, or $2.85 per share, from $1.06-billion, or 38 cents per share, a year earlier. Analysts on average had expected a profit of $1.96 per share, according to Refinitiv IBES data.

Overall revenue plunged 12 per cent, while loans were down 3 per cent.

Citi’s consumer bank shrank during the quarter, as fewer customers took loans on their cards. Customers continued to pay off their monthly balances and loans on cards fell 4 per cent. Revenue from those cards declined 12 per cent.

Global consumer revenue fell 7 per cent to $6.8-billion, compared with the year-ago quarter, due in large part to lower card balances.

Story continues below advertisement

Trading revenue slumped 30 per cent to $4.8-billion, as the bank suffered from comparisons to a year earlier when unprecedented volatility in financial markets helped drive record trading volumes for Wall Street banks.

Revenue from fixed income trading, a strong suit for Citigroup, slumped 43 per cent to $3.2-billion from a year earlier.

On Tuesday, both JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs reported big declines in bond trading revenue.

Expenses at Citigroup jumped by 7 per cent during the quarter, led by spending to improve its risk and control systems to comply with demands from regulators. The size of the increase suggested that the bank might miss its estimate from April that expenses for the full-year would increase only 2 per cent to 3 per cent.

Investors are particularly concerned about expenses as the bank has been unable to say how much money and time it will take to meet the requirements of regulators and fix its systems.

The expenses are part of what Fraser has called the “transformation” of Citigroup and include technology improvements that she expects will ultimately bring down costs.

Story continues below advertisement

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies