Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Attorney Steven Donziger arrives for his criminal contempt trail at the Manhattan Federal Courthouse, on May 10.

BRENDAN MCDERMID/Reuters

A disbarred American lawyer who spent more than two decades trying to prove Chevron Corp polluted Ecuador’s rainforest was found guilty on Monday by a U.S. judge of six counts of criminal contempt.

U.S. District Judge Loretta Preska in Manhattan ruled that attorney Steven Donziger “repeatedly and willfully” defied court orders, including by failing to turn over his computer, phones and other electronic devices.

“It’s time to pay the piper,” Preska wrote in a 241-page decision, following a five-day trial with no jury in May.

Story continues below advertisement

In a statement, Donziger pledged to appeal. He called the decision an “obvious travesty of justice” designed to validate Chevron’s “demonize Donziger” strategy, and renewed his claim that Preska structured the trial to make him “appear guilty.”

Chevron did not respond immediately to requests for comment.

Donziger has said the case violated his constitutional due process rights and that the private lawyers serving as prosecutors for the United States were appointed illegally.

Those lawyers did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Donziger has been confined to his home for nearly two years while defending himself.

The case is the latest twist stemming from Donziger’s representation of villagers in Ecuador’s Lago Agrio region, who sought to hold Chevron liable for water and soil contamination from 1964 and 1992 by Texaco, which Chevron later acquired.

Donziger, a Harvard Law School graduate, won a $9.5 billion judgment against Chevron in an Ecuadorian court in 2011.

But San Ramon, California-based Chevron sued Donziger in federal court in Manhattan later that year, claiming that he and his associates pressured the presiding judge in Ecuador.

Story continues below advertisement

Chevron has also said Texaco cleaned up the pollution, and state-owned Petroecuador was mainly responsible for the contamination.

In 2014, U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan refused to enforce the $9.5 billion judgment, saying it had been secured through bribery, fraud and extortion.

Chevron later sought to recoup money Donziger personally reaped in the Ecuador case, and Kaplan ordered Donziger to turn over electronic devices to the company’s forensic experts. When he refused, Kaplan charged him with criminal contempt.

In her decision, Preska emphasized that the contempt case focused on Donziger’s conduct, and had nothing to do with Chevron’s responsibility for any pollution in Ecuador.

“Contrary to Mr. Donziger’s assertion that his conviction was ‘pre-ordained,’ the Court finds him guilty on each count for one reason and one reason only: Mr. Donziger did that with which he is charged. Period.”

Lawyers for Donziger have said he could face six months behind bars. Donziger was disbarred by a New York state appeals court last August.

Story continues below advertisement

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies