Skip to main content

Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV on Wednesday said it faces a $79 million U.S. civil penalty for failing to meet 2017 fuel economy requirements, as regulators reported more automakers were falling short of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions standards.

The Italian-American automaker said the payment is not expected to have a material impact on its business.

Of 18 major carmakers in the United States, 13 including Fiat Chrysler, failed to comply with fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards for the 2017 model year without using credits, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

Story continues below advertisement

The agency said its review of model year 2017 vehicles showed “automakers falling further behind current standards.”

The 2017 model fleet fell 1-1/2 miles per gallon short of the 33.8 mpg standard based on yearly performance without including credits, NHTSA reported. The shortfall was 1/2 mile per gallon for the 2016 model year.

NHTSA said more automakers were failing to comply with standards for the 2018 and 2019 model years, “and the potential penalties on automakers, which are passed along to consumers, are expected to continue to increase.”

The Trump administration has used the widening gap between the emissions of automakers’ U.S. fleets, which are skewing toward larger vehicles, and national vehicle CO2 emissions standards to bolster its case for freezing vehicle emissions and mileage standards at current levels through 2026.

Environmental groups and regulators in California and other states are fighting against any rollback in standards, saying tough rules are needed to address climate change and reduce consumer outlays for fuel.

NHTSA and the Environmental Protection Agency are working to finalize as early as next month a rewrite of the Obama administration’s fuel efficiency requirements, which call for sharp reductions in fleet-wide emissions by 2026.

Fiat Chrysler is paying fines for the shortfall in its domestic passenger car fleet, which includes several front-wheel Jeep and Dodge two-wheel drive SUVs and some sedans and muscle-cars. The automaker killed its slow-selling domestic small and midsize sedans.

Story continues below advertisement

After paying $77.3 million last year for a 2016 model year fuel-economy shortfall, a Fiat Chrysler spokesman confirmed Wednesday the company had received a letter on the 2017 penalty and has 60 days to pay the fine.

In its report, NHTSA said Fiat Chrysler - which reiterated plans Wednesday to spend $10 billion through 2022 to develop more than 30 hybrid and electric vehicles - had failed to meet the 2017 minimum “domestic passenger car” requirements.

The company said it “continues to support and deliver year-over-year fuel-economy improvements.”

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing General Motors Co, Volkswagen AG , Toyota Motor Corp and others, said NHTSA’s “report shows continued progress and higher fuel economy across the entire fleet, but it also shows the continued gap between the standards and the market.

“The Alliance continues to advocate for increased standards that are attainable and reflect marketplace realities,” the lobbying group said in a statement.

The Trump administration gave automakers another respite on fuel economy in July, when it canceled a rule that would have more than doubled penalties for automakers failing to meet fuel efficiency requirements.

Story continues below advertisement

Automakers protested the hike, saying it could increase industry compliance costs by $1 billion annually.

Obama-era rules call for a fleetwide fuel-efficiency average of 46.7 miles per gallon by 2026. That compares with 37 mpg under the Trump administration’s preferred option.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter