Skip to main content

The Associated Press

Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. declined to appear on Wednesday at a U.S. House of Representatives hearing on issues relating to the ride-hailing industry, a congressional committee said.

The two ride-hailing companies had been asked to appear as part of a House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee inquiry on safety and labour practices as lawmakers seek to prepare legislation that will impact the industry. “Their failure to appear at this hearing is a telling sign that they would rather suffer a public lashing than answer questions on the record about their operations,” the head of the panel, U.S. Representative Peter DeFazio, a Democrat, said in his prepared remarks.

DeFazio added that the hearing “should also serve also a wake-up call to the companies that have flooded our roadways with disruptive technologies and investor capital that their days of operating with little public policy and regulatory oversight in the transportation space are coming to an end.”

Story continues below advertisement

He raised a number of issues, from safety to congestion to wages of drivers.

“Perhaps they don’t want to talk about what their model is doing to drive down wages and turn our transportation work force from a skilled, trained pool of workers earning living wages to another casualty of the gig economy,” DeFazio said.

Earlier this week, he urged the companies’ chief executives in a letter to participate in the inquiry even as Uber and Lyft directed lawmakers to third-party industry associations.

DeFazio added “the tenuous existence of Uber and Lyft is literally fuelled by millions of independent contractors who see their take home pay reduced drastically – below minimum wage in some states – as they are made to pay fees collected by the company, self-employment taxes, and costs associated with operating and maintaining their vehicles.”

He said the companies, which have reported substantial losses, “don’t make information about their process for deactivating dangerous drivers public. They don’t share data on the prevalence of assaults on their platforms. They don’t reveal details on how drivers are paid. What we do know is that both these companies are struggling since going public … Clearly, this business model is not sustainable.

Uber on Monday confirmed it had received DeFazio’s request.

Lyft said this week it would work with lawmakers and said the committee is reviewing “important topics that we take very seriously. We look forward to future discussions.”

Story continues below advertisement

The companies did not immediately comment Wednesday.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Unchecking box will stop auto data updates
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies