Skip to main content

Report On Business Magazine Keep calm and carry on: How investors can weather turbulent markets

M.ORE

Financial sages often warn investors not to succumb to fear or greed. You have to wonder what planet they’re living on, especially after a tumultuous year like 2018, when stock markets veered from one extreme to the other with barely a pause for a Valium in between. Both the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index of leading U.S. stocks and Toronto’s S&P/TSX Composite tumbled in the first quarter, rallied in the summer and then plunged into a tailspin last fall to end the year down by 9% and 12%, respectively. Yet in the first quarter of this year, they surged back up to about the same levels they were at in January 2018.

“The markets are giving us a lot of information on a silver platter,” says David Rosenberg, chief economist and strategist at Gluskin Sheff + Associates in Toronto. Well, yes, they're certainly moving in intriguing ways, but analyzing the trends doesn't yield a consensus forecast. Some experts believe markets will climb even higher this year; others say they'll struggle or slump. As is often the case, many of the disagreements among them are based on differences in basic attitude.

Rosenberg, who has a developed a reputation as an often-far-sighted bear in his three-decade career on Wall and Bay Streets, has been warning for two years that the U.S. bull market in stocks appears to be near its end. While not exactly gloating, he notes that the S&P 500 peaked near the 3,000 barrier twice in 2018—once in January and once in September—yet failed to crack it. Yes, the benchmark index made it back to 2,800 this March, but Rosenberg says that looks like “a very firm ceiling,” and U.S. and Canadian markets will likely keep drifting sideways at best. "If my forecast of a recession in the coming year proves to be prescient, then there’s more downside to this market than upside,” he says.

Story continues below advertisement

How Shopify made Kylie Jenner rich(er)

Is Shaw’s wireless success enough to offset its cable business declines?

Onex’s art of the deal: For Gerry Schwartz, bland is good for business. But is it enough in the face of new challenges?

Why RBC is becoming the New England Patriots of Bay Street

Yet there are still optimists to be found. Candice Bangsund, vice-president and portfolio manager of global asset allocation at Fiera Capital in Montreal, says the dominant force worldwide in 2019 will be “synchronized global expansion.” This will be led by China, she says, which is aggressively stimulating its economy and seems determined to conclude a trade deal with the Trump administration—or to reduce tensions, at least. Canada, in turn, should benefit from the new United States—Mexico—Canada Agreement (assuming it is ratified by legislatures in each country). Fiera forecasts a 5.6% return for U.S. stocks and a hefty 17.3% for Canadian stocks in 2019. “I realize this is a very out-of-consensus call,” Bangsund says.

Her projection for Canadian stocks is certainly a stretch, given the Canadian market's sluggish performance in recent years. As our annual Top 1000 tables, which begin on page 48, show once again, the Canadian market is dominated by financials, energy and materials. By and large, the Big Six banks recorded solid increases in revenue and profits in 2018. They have soared since the financial crisis, in part because of low interest rates. But the share prices of many energy and mining companies continued to struggle last year, weighed down by weak prices for oil, metals and other commodities.

U.S. stocks have led since the financial

crisis, but struggled last year

U.S. INDEX ETF (TSX: XSP)

CANADIAN INDEX etf (XIU)

Europe, AUstralasia AND

Far East INDEX ETF (XIN)

60%

40

20

0

2014

2019

Average annual return over the past

five years (MSCI Canadian-dollar indexes)

15.1%

7.7%

5.6%

5.0%

canada

U.S.

europe

emerging

markets

Canadian stocks still trade at low

multiples compared to the U.S.

P/E ratio (trailing)

canada

17.4

U.S.

20.2

europe

15.5

emerging markets

13.1

But the choice of sectors is

limited and old school

S&P/TSX Composite

Index by sector

Financials

32.5%

energy

18.4%

materials

11.1%

10.6%

industrials

communications

5.7%

other

21.7%

S&P 500 Index

by sector

technology

20.6%

consumer

17%

health care

14.8%

financials

13.3%

communications

10.1%

other

24.2%

U.S. stocks have led since the financial crisis,

but struggled last year

U.S. INDEX ETF (TSX: XSP)

CANADIAN INDEX etf (XIU)

Europe, AUstralasia AND

Far East INDEX ETF (XIN)

60%

40

20

0

2014

2019

Average annual return over the past

five years (MSCI Canadian-dollar indexes)

15.1%

7.7%

5.6%

5.0%

canada

U.S.

europe

emerging

markets

Canadian stocks still trade at low

multiples compared to the U.S.

P/E ratio (trailing)

canada

17.4

U.S.

20.2

europe

15.5

emerging markets

13.1

But the choice of sectors is

limited and old school

S&P/TSX Composite

Index by sector

Financials

32.5%

energy

18.4%

materials

11.1%

industrials

10.6%

communications

5.7%

other

21.7%

S&P 500 Index

by sector

technology

20.6%

consumer

17%

health care

14.8%

financials

13.3%

communications

10.1%

other

24.2%

U.S. stocks have led since the financial crisis, but struggled last year

U.S. INDEX ETF (TSX: XSP)

CANADIAN INDEX etf (XIU)

Europe, AUstralasia AND Far East INDEX ETF (XIN)

60%

40

20

0

2014

2019

Average annual return over the past

five years (MSCI Canadian-dollar indexes)

Canadian stocks still trade at low

multiples compared to the U.S.

P/E ratio (trailing)

15.1%

canada

17.4

7.7%

U.S.

20.2

5.6%

5.0%

europe

15.5

canada

U.S.

europe

emerging

markets

emerging markets

13.1

But the choice of sectors is limited and old school

S&P/TSX Composite Index by sector

S&P 500 Index by sector

Financials

32.5%

technology

20.6%

energy

18.4%

consumer

17%

materials

11.1%

health care

14.8%

10.6%

industrials

financials

13.3%

communications

5.7%

communications

10.1%

other

21.7%

other

24.2%

Much of the 2019 outlook depends on projections for interest rates and commodity prices. Rosenberg is alarmed by a traditional warning sign of an impending recession and market correction: “The U.S. and Canadian yield curves are as flat as a pancake,” he says. The Federal Reserve and Bank of Canada have hiked short-term interest rates over the past three years, and in March, yields on short-term U.S. Treasury bonds moved above those for 10-year bonds for the first time since 2007. Long-term rates tend to be based more on market expectations for economic growth and inflation, and those yields have sagged—hence the flat curves. To Rosenberg, that means “we’re past the peak on growth, past the peak on inflation and past the peak on interest rates.”

Central bankers also started the year cautiously. In the Bank of Canada's official statement about keeping its policy rate at 1.75% in March, it noted consumer spending, business investment and exports were all weak, and that “continues to warrant a policy interest rate that is below its neutral range"—meaning no more rate increases any time soon. Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell was more straightforward in an interview on 60 Minutes: “We don't feel any hurry to change our interest rate policy,” he said.

Bangsund is more upbeat. To her, there is an elephant on the global stage, and that is “the massive amounts of stimulus in China over the past six months"—injecting money into its banking system, keeping interest rates low, cutting taxes and spending big on infrastructure. Assuming there’s no trade war with Trump, and possibly a trade deal, global growth should accelerate, commodity prices will rise and central banks may very well have to start raising rates again in the second half of the year to contain inflation.

In Canada, the key commodity price is crude oil, and it has cast a pall over Alberta since collapsing in 2014 and 2015. After bottoming near $30 (U.S.) a barrel in early 2016, the benchmark price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude climbed back above $70 (U.S.) last fall. But it then sank below $50 (U.S.) in December, before working its way back to $60 (U.S.) in March.

Even without that kind of volatility, the trouble for Canadian producers is that the Western Canadian Select (WCS) benchmark price is stuck in a range lower than WTI, reflecting a shortage of pipeline capacity to transport oil and gas to coastal export terminals and southern U.S. markets. In December, WCS plunged to absurd lows near $5 (U.S.) a barrel, though it's recently made it back above $40 (U.S.).

Story continues below advertisement

Les Stelmach, an energy expert and portfolio manager with Franklin Bissett Investment Management in Calgary, is impressed that many producers continued to earn solid profits last year. Those included well-capitalized integrated giants, such as Imperial Oil and Suncor, but also oil sands specialist Canadian Natural Resources. Stelmach says some smaller companies have additionally learned to become more efficient during a slump, such as midsize Arc Resources. “I think it is doing an admirable job managing a business through a tough period,” he says.

Despite earning profits for three years in a row, however, Arc’s share price has declined by roughly half since 2016, and it was dropped from the S&P/TSX 60 Index in March. That is a blow—it means many index funds are no longer obliged to hold its stock. Arc’s troubles are not unique. Price-to-earnings multiples across the whole energy sector remain depressed.

Stelmach says sentiment among oil investors won’t improve unless whichever party wins the federal election this fall does more to get pipelines built. Like a lot of executives and money managers in Calgary, Stelmach is puzzled by what he calls the Trudeau government’s “conversion factor of importance” for job losses. “Nine thousand hypothetical SNC-Lavalin jobs seem to be greater than 100,000 jobs in Western Canada,” he says. “I’m sorry, but that’s what it feels like to a lot of people here.”

For value investors in particular, if companies or entire sectors are trading at low multiples—as many energy, mining and forestry firms are on the TSX—that ought to provide opportunities. But George Athanassakos, a professor of finance and the Ben Graham Chair in Value Investing at Ivey Business School in London, Ontario, says Canada presents some unique challenges. Value investors focus on individual companies and often don’t pay much attention to the economy or other big-picture variables. But commodity price cycles and economic forecasts are critical factors in valuing Canadian resource providers. “You almost have to be a market timer,” Athanassakos says.

Timing is always difficult—it often takes a long time for fundamentals to reassert themselves in markets. To help you pick individual stocks, we have again added a stock rating system to the Top 1000. Investing expert Norman Rothery has graded the 250 biggest stocks on the TSX from one to five stars, resulting in 20 recommended Megastar stocks (page 44). But he starts with a warning this year: His 2018 picks also looked attractive based on fundamentals, yet they lost 16.5%.

As in years past, for opportunities in sectors that aren’t well-represented on the TSX, such as tech and health care, experts say you need to turn to the United States or markets overseas. But U.S. markets look highly valued, while emerging markets appear cheaper but more volatile. Investing successfully is rarely easy, whatever strategy you pursue. Keep calm and carry on.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...