Skip to main content

The head of Nvidia Corp. vowed to invest in Britain with more jobs and R&D as part of its US$40-billion purchase of chip designer Arm that has sparked concerns about Arm’s independence and future in the country.

Nvidia, the biggest U.S. chip company by market capitalization, has agreed to buy Arm from Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp., prompting the office of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson to say it would scrutinize the deal and act if necessary.

Arm is the most important technology company in Britain, and one of a handful of European tech groups that operate on a global scale. Its energy-efficient designs dominate the smartphone sector, with its licensees including Apple Inc. shipping 180 billion chips to date.

Story continues below advertisement

It was sold in 2016 to Japan’s SoftBank after the conglomerate pledged to retain Arm’s headquarters in Cambridge, England, and increase jobs – a commitment that Nvidia chief executive Jensen Huang reiterated on Monday.

“We want to grow Arm and make it become even greater,” Mr. Huang told analysts on a call, adding Arm would hire more engineers, spend more on research and run a new artificial intelligence research centre in Cambridge.

“The U.K. government will realize that we are making a very significant investment in the U.K.,” Mr. Huang added. He stopped short, however, of making formal job guarantees and said talks with the British government had yet to begin in earnest.

A spokesman for Mr. Johnson said ministers had spoken to the relevant companies and were looking at what the deal meant for Arm’s Cambridge base.

U.S. SELLOUT?

The deal, announced overnight, drew criticism from Hermann Hauser, a co-founder of Arm who said in an interview it would spell disaster for Cambridge, Britain and Europe.

“It’s the last European technology company with global relevance and it’s being sold to the Americans,” he said.

The deal would, he fears, risk jeopardizing Arm’s position as the “Switzerland of the semi-conductor industry” where it allows hundreds of companies such as Apple, Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Qualcomm Inc. to develop their own chips using its architecture.

Story continues below advertisement

If the company’s British character and open business model could not be protected, it would be better for Mr. Johnson to back a flotation on the London Stock Exchange, Mr. Hauser said.

COMMITMENTS

Industry and potential antitrust concerns over the deal relate to the fact that Nvidia competes with hundreds of Arm’s customers, whereas tech investor SoftBank does not.

Nvidia’s Mr. Huang said he would retain Arm’s neutral licensing model and expand it by licensing out Nvidia intellectual property for the first time.

The head of Arm, Simon Segar, said a purchase by a U.S. company would not affect which countries it sold to.

Mr. Johnson’s government, set to embark on a new industrial strategy as Britain leaves the European Union at the end of this year, could investigate the deal on national security grounds, and request certain undertakings in order for it to pass.

Neil Campling, head of TMT research at Mirabaud, said it was unlikely that Britain would block it.

Story continues below advertisement

“I expect Nvidia to give commitments to maintain the intellectual property investment and leadership,” said Mr. Campling, adding Nvidia would play up its heft as the world’s most valuable semi-conductor company to reassure the British government.

Be smart with your money. Get the latest investing insights delivered right to your inbox three times a week, with the Globe Investor newsletter. Sign up today.

Report an error
Tickers mentioned in this story
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies