Skip to main content

Alberta has slashed the number of farms that must provide insurance coverage for their employees.

Jeff McIntosh/The Canadian Press

Alberta has slashed the number of farms that must provide insurance coverage for their employees as it rewrites a slew of the province’s rules governing protections for labourers in the agriculture sector.

The United Conservative Party campaigned on a promise to repeal the previous government’s farm safety rules, which demanded thousands of farm operators enroll in the province’s Workers’ Compensation Board program. The UCP wanted to abolish this and other changes the New Democratic Party imposed. The UCP, as well as angry farmers, argued the NDP’s safety and employment rules were too onerous for small farms, and that operators should not be forced to enroll in WCB’s program.

The UCP’s legislation, introduced Wednesday and known as Bill 26, will allow farms to choose between private insurance and WCB. However, this rule comes with an asterisk: It only applies to operations that employ six or more people, excluding family members and labourers who have been on the payroll for less than six months. Farms and ranches that meet the exemption criteria will not have to provide any insurance program for employees. The UCP originally indicated it would set the employee exemption ceiling at three, making its new legislation an even more aggressive rollback than expected.

Story continues below advertisement

“We wanted to make sure that small family farms are protected,” Devin Dreeshen, the province’s agriculture minister, told reporters.

The government did not specify how many labourers its new rules would affect, but did estimate that roughly three-quarters of Alberta farms would fall under the small-farm exemption. Bob Barnetson, a professor of labour relations at Athabasca University who specializes in farm workers, said the UCP’s plan will leave most farm employees without injury compensation because the majority of Alberta’s farms have fewer than six employees, and many are seasonal.

“If they get hurt, they basically are going to be out of luck," he said. “Their only recourse would be to sue their employer and few injured workers would be able to do that successfully.”

Private insurance and WCB each have advantages. Private insurance, for example, can cover employees if they are injured off the job. Certain programs can also cover family members for benefits such as dental. WCB only covers injuries that happen while employees are working, but unlike private insurance, payments are not subject to a maximum cap. Further, employers with WCB coverage are protected from being sued by injured workers. Some farms in Alberta offered employees private insurance or WCB prior to the NDP’s farm legislation, known as Bill 6.

Small farms – those that meet the six-employee exemption – will also be relieved from meeting all employment standard rules, such as overtime and restrictions on what youths are permitted to do on farms. Occupational Health and Safety requirements will also be lightened for all farms and ranches. Further, labour relations rules that allow employees to unionize will no longer apply to farms and ranches, effective immediately. The other changes kick in next year.

There are about 40,600 farm operations in Alberta, according to the 2016 census. Of those, about 6,700 employ a collective 16,600 people year-round as full or part-time workers; another 6,000 farms employ a total of 16,800 seasonal or temporary workers.

With files from The Canadian Press

Story continues below advertisement

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies