Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24 weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Alberta’s Court of Appeal has ruled that the University of Alberta was wrong to ask a student group to provide $17,500 to cover security costs as a condition before holding an anti-abortion protest on campus, in a decision that appears to extend free expression rights to postsecondary campuses.

A student’s freedom of expression on a university campus is protected by the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the court ruled in a decision released on Monday. The court found that the Edmonton-based university failed to balance the campus group’s rights with the risk of counterdemonstrations in requiring such a hefty security fee.

The court’s recognition that Charter rights apply to students on campuses is largely unprecedented in Canada and aligns Alberta closely with the position taken by American courts that security costs violate the exercise of free speech, according to Nathan Whitling, a lawyer who worked for the BC Civil Liberties Association as an intervenor in the case.

Story continues below advertisement

The court’s decision follows a push by Alberta Premier Jason Kenney’s government to require universities to clarify and strengthen their free-speech policies by the end of last year.

Jay Cameron, a lawyer with the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms who represented the campus group in the case, said he was pleased with the court’s decision. “It sets out protections for students on university grounds that had not been set out as distinctly in the past as in this case,” Mr. Cameron said.

“Now, a university can’t prevent events from proceeding or prevent expression based on the content of expression, as long as that content is otherwise legal. And it’s legal to hold pro-life views,” he added.

The events in the case started in March, 2015, when the group UAlberta Pro-Life mounted large photo displays in the University of Alberta’s main quad. A counterdemonstration was formed by students, faculty, staff and members of the public, which held up banners and chanted to obstruct the event.

When the group applied to hold a similar display in 2016, the university said its approval was conditional on UAlberta Pro-Life providing $17,500 to cover expected security costs. The group responded that the proposed sum was prohibitive and denied them their freedom of expression. On Monday, the court sided with the group.

In its ruling, the court found that making a university subject to the Charter “in relation to freedom of expression by students on university grounds does not threaten the ability of the university to maintain its independence or to uphold its academic standards.” In a concurring opinion, two of the three judges who presided over the case found that the reasoning on the Charter’s application was correct, but wasn’t essential to the case.

Hallie Brodie, a spokeswoman for the university, said in a statement: “The University of Alberta will be reviewing the decision in detail and therefore reserves further comment at this time.”

Story continues below advertisement

In three previous cases, courts in Ontario, Saskatchewan and B.C. have ruled that the Charter does not extend to students on campus, according to Mr. Whitling. Alberta’s decision now sets the province apart. “Essentially, Alberta is now in line with the position in the U.S. There have been many cases in the U.S. that confirm it is unconstitutional to impose a security cost for the exercise of free speech. This is the first Canadian case to adopt that position,” he said.

Mr. Kenney’s government gave university campuses until mid-December to adopt free-speech codes that enshrine the principle that no one may obstruct the free-speech rights of others and that students mustn’t be shielded from ideas. The government has said it may withhold part of a university’s funding in future years if it doesn’t uphold the new free-speech policies.

Alberta Minister of Advanced Education Demetrios Nicolaides’s office declined to comment on the court’s decision and the government’s free-speech policy.

“Given the autonomy of the Alberta’s postsecondary institutions, it would be inappropriate for the government to become involved in the operations of the institution,” said press secretary Laurie Chandler.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies