Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

The federal government has determined that the Springbank Off-Stream Reservoir, a proposed flood-control structure intended to protect Calgary, would not likely cause significant environmental harm.

The Impact Assessment Agency of Canada said the project “isn’t likely to cause significant adverse environmental effects.” It proposed mitigation measures that will become binding if the project receives final federal approval.

Alberta Transportation plans to build the reservoir in Rocky View County, about 15 kilometres west of Calgary, in an area long used for ranching and agriculture. The reservoir would usually be empty, and would receive water from the Elbow River through a diversion channel during floods, reducing flows into Calgary’s Glenmore Reservoir. Stored water would be gradually released back into the river after the danger subsides. It would be among the largest flood-mitigation structures in Canada.

Story continues below advertisement

It has faced considerable opposition from nearby landowners, First Nations and communities, some of whom said they would prefer a dam further upstream. Karin Hunter, president of the Springbank Community Association, said the project would disturb an area larger than Vancouver’s Stanley Park.

“The whole region is sort of a boundary between forest and native grassland and prairies, along with a good chunk of wetlands,” she said. “So it’s a really, really big footprint. … You can’t undo it once it’s done.”

The federal agency’s assessment identified a wide range of environmental consequences. For example, sediment accumulated in the reservoir could become airborne dust in windy conditions. The agency concluded such effects would be localized and reversible, and proposed that Alberta Transportation finalize a plan to manage air quality before construction, with advice from the federal health and environment departments.

The agency concluded Springbank might also affect groundwater, but any changes would be short-term and of low magnitude; local wells would remain usable. It recommended that Alberta Transportation add more wells to its groundwater-monitoring program.

The project would also destroy wildlife habitat. Alberta Transportation has said it will install “wildlife-friendly” fences that animals can get over or underneath, and that animals will be able to pass freely through the area when the reservoir is empty. The agency agreed with Alberta Transportation’s proposed mitigation measures and did not impose new ones.

McKenzie Kibler, press secretary for Minister of Transportation Ric McIver, said provincial officials are still reviewing the draft conditions.

“Alberta Transportation will continue to work diligently to ensure this project crosses the regulatory finish line and can begin construction as soon as possible,” he wrote in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

Calgary is at the confluence of the Bow and Elbow rivers, and is vulnerable to severe flooding. In 2013, swaths of the city were inundated in one of Canada’s costliest natural disasters.

The city regards the reservoir as crucial to becoming more resilient. The municipality has said events on the scale of the 2013 floods will become more frequent owing to climate change. A 2017 study anticipated that without the reservoir, flood damage to Calgary would average nearly $170-million a year. Of all mitigation options considered, the city said Springbank will deliver the highest benefits relative to its costs.

Failure to get approval of the reservoir “will set back flood mitigation efforts on the Elbow River potentially for decades,” the city said in November.

The project was scheduled to be operational this spring, but has been delayed. The federal assessment (which is proceeding under the previous, now-repealed environmental assessment legislation) began in 2015. In 2017, the agency’s predecessor, the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, said Alberta’s initial assessment didn’t meet its guidelines, and demanded more details.

Calgary Mayor Naheed Nenshi blasted Ottawa’s approach to environmental assessments. “Four premiers from three different political parties have agreed on what is needed,” he wrote in The Globe and Mail in 2019. “But we can’t get what we need built.”

The Tsuut’ina Nation, the closest Indigenous community to the project, had objected for years, but withdrew its opposition last April, after negotiating a $32-million provincial grant.

Story continues below advertisement

More obstacles remain. According to the province, only 25 per cent of the necessary land has been purchased. Last year, Alberta estimated the reservoir would cost $432-million, up from $297-million. Ms. Hunter said the agency’s proposed mitigation requirements would further increase costs.

“It’s going to be $700-million plus by the time it’s done,” she predicted.

The agency is seeking public comments on its draft findings, and will hold virtual information sessions later this month. The federal environment minister is expected to make the final decision. Alberta’s Natural Resources Conservation Board is reviewing the project to determine whether it’s in the public interest. Public hearings are scheduled to begin March 22.

Alberta Transportation says the reservoir would take three years to build.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies