Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The sun sets as water covers a street near the Elbow River in Calgary on June 22, 2013.

JONATHAN HAYWARD/The Canadian Press

A lawyer for Alberta Transportation says there’s a serious and urgent need for a proposed reservoir that could protect Calgary from future flooding.

Ron Kruhlak made the comment during his closing argument Tuesday before the Natural Resources Conservation Board, an arm’s-length agency of the Alberta government.

The board held a two-week-long hearing to determine whether the project is in the public interest by considering its social, economic and environmental effects.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta Transportation proposed the $432-million off-stream reservoir near the rural community of Springbank, Alta., which is west and upstream of Calgary.

“The evidence clearly supports the conclusion that there is a serious need for this project to be built as soon as possible, that this project is in the public interest for the people of Alberta,” said Kruhlak.

The reservoir, which would divert water from the Elbow River, was proposed after extensive flooding in Calgary in 2013. It led to five fatalities and more than $5-billion in damages across southern Alberta.

The project has the support of Calgary, but it has faced opposition from some landowners – including the Springbank community and the Stoney Nakoda First Nation.

“The public interest must also include flood protection for communities upstream of the City of Calgary and must recognize their riparian rights,” said Sara Louden, a lawyer representing Stoney Nakoda.

“The public interest cannot assume the priority of urban populations over rural populations. The public interest must include the oldest rights holders of this land, the Indigenous peoples.”

Richard Secord, a lawyer for the Springbank Community Landowners Group, said his clients also don’t believe the project is in the public interest.

Story continues below advertisement

“If approved, one community wins flood protection to a one-in-200 year level and one loses its environment, its heritage, its culture, its quality of life and potentially its future,” he said in his closing argument.

“(The project) does not have the support of the Springbank community.”

Alberta Transportation, however, argued that it’s not the board’s job to look at other potential projects.

“There is only one project under review, only one project being advanced,” said Kruhlak, noting the sole purpose of the reservoir is to deliver flood mitigation on the Elbow River.

“The 2013 flood was a terrible event,” he said. “The need for this project is without question.

“The project is needed and it is needed now.”

Story continues below advertisement

The provincial department got support at the hearing from the Calgary River Community Action Group, Flood Free Calgary and the City of Calgary.

“The 2013 flood had a significant impact on public safety and public infrastructure,” said Lou Cusano, a lawyer representing the group.

He said the reservoir would have both a public benefit and improve public safety.

Melissa Senek, a lawyer for the City of Calgary, added that the benefits of the reservoir are staggering.

“(It) is the most important piece of proposed infrastructure in the history of the City of Calgary and the broader Calgary region,” she said. “This is critical public investment necessary for the protection of human life and regional infrastructure.

“If this project is completed, the residents of Calgary will finally have protection from one of the greatest threats currently facing the city.”

Story continues below advertisement

The board has said it would issue a decision report within 80 business days once the hearing concludes.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies