Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney listens as the 2021 budget is delivered in Edmonton on Feb. 25, 2021.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

Alberta Premier Jason Kenney says his government will ensure that people can choose which COVID-19 vaccine they get, in part over concerns in some religious communities about the use of fetal cell lines in their development.

Public health experts have warned that allowing people to shop around for their preferred vaccine could slow a mass vaccination program that aims to reach as many people as possible with a limited supply of doses. Other provinces have balked at letting people pick and choose vaccines, including Quebec, where the fetal cell issue has also emerged as a concern among some Catholics in the province.

Mr. Kenney said he understands the moral questions about AstraZeneca and other vaccines that were developed using cell lines that were derived decades ago from aborted fetuses. Cell lines refer to a lineage of cells that are reproduced for medical purposes.

Story continues below advertisement

“I’ve been clear with our health officials here that people must have a choice partly to reflect their conscientious concerns that they may have on those ethical issues, but also they may be really well-read in the science of the competing vaccines and they may choose one over another for reasons of tested efficacy or other factors,” Mr. Kenney said during a live Facebook video on Wednesday evening.

Tracking Canada’s COVID-19 vaccine rollout plans: A continuing guide

Coronavirus tracker: How many COVID-19 cases are there in Canada and worldwide? The latest maps and charts

While no direct head-to-head study has been conducted on the COVID-19 vaccines, current data suggest the AstraZeneca shot is just as effective as the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccines at preventing serious illness and death. However, it may be less effective at preventing mild illness.

Alberta has already been allowing choice in a limited way. People aged 50-64 have the option of signing up for the AstraZeneca vaccine now or waiting their turn in the wider queue when they will be able to get vaccines produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna.

Mr. Kenney suggested that when additional vaccines are in use, including one from Johnson & Johnson that was recently approved, as well as others that are in trials or awaiting a decision from Health Canada, Albertans will be able to choose between any that are available.

The province’s Chief Medical Officer of Health, Deena Hinshaw, said on Thursday that the province is still sorting out the extent to which people will be able to choose their vaccines as more are approved, and how that might work, though she encouraged Albertans to take the first vaccine they are offered.

The debate about allowing people to have some say in which vaccine they get has grown louder as more manufacturers receive approval from Health Canada. Currently there are four vaccines approved for use in this country, with additional approvals possible soon.

B.C.’s Provincial Health Officer, Bonnie Henry, has dismissed the idea that people should have a choice: “Let me be very clear: The vaccine you are offered is the best vaccine,” she said last week. Ontario is not officially allowing vaccine choice, though the province has noted that people can influence what vaccine they get by booking in specific locations. The AstraZeneca vaccine, for example, is only being administered in pharmacies, while the ones from Pfizer and Moderna are available in hospital clinics.

Story continues below advertisement

Concerns about the use of fetal cells have added another layer.

The AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines were both developed using cell lines that were derived from legally aborted fetuses in the 1970s. There are also myths circulating online that claim some vaccines contain fetal tissue, which is not true.

The Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops has issued several statements raising concerns about the use of fetal tissue in vaccine development. The conference recently told Catholics that they should opt for the Moderna or Pfizer vaccines if given the choice but issued a statement on Thursday that made it clear that it is morally permissible to use any vaccine if it is the only one available.

The Archbishop of Montreal issued a statement on Thursday that said Catholics “can, in good conscience, be inoculated with any of the authorized vaccines” and that doing so would be a charitable act.

The pharmaceutical industry’s use of cell lines originating from fetal tissue is a long-standing issue for some religious groups and abortion opponents.

While the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are not produced using human cell lines, some of the materials used in the testing of those vaccines may involve the use of those cell lines – as do a wide array of drugs and pharmaceutical products that are in common use.

Story continues below advertisement

Moira McQueen, who is executive director of the Canadian Catholic Bioethics Institute in Toronto, said for those who oppose the use of the cell lines, the ethical question is one that should be balanced with the risk to health and safety in instances when options are not available, a position taken by the Catholic Church. Dr. McQueen was among the signatories sent by a coalition of Christian groups last May to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau urging the development of vaccines that do not “create ethical dilemmas for Canadians.”

“If there were the possibility that by refusing a vaccine someone might endanger themselves, their families or other people, and where there is no assurance that [alternatives] will be available within a very short time … then I think people should be vaccinated anyway.”

Stephan Hwang, a physician and research scientist at St. Michael’s Hospital in Toronto, worries that encouraging people to choose between vaccines could cause some to delay their shots until they can get the one they want.

“It raises the potential that people will delay vaccination in an effort to get a preferred vaccine in a situation where every day and every week counts,” he said.

“This is not a situation where time is on our side.”

Dr. Hwang said differences in the effectiveness between vaccines are not significant and don’t justify anyone delaying getting a vaccine if there is one available to them.

Story continues below advertisement

With a report from Les Perreaux in Montreal

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies