Skip to main content

Matthew de Grood is seen in a 2014 courtroom sketch.

Janice Fletcher/The Canadian Press

A review panel has reserved its decision on what privileges it may allow a man found not criminally responsible for killing five young people at a Calgary house party while suffering schizophrenic delusions.

A Crown prosecutor and mental-health officials have agreed with a proposal to ease Matthew de Grood back into society.

The psychiatrist in charge of Mr. de Grood’s medical treatment said the man’s risk of reoffending is low.

Story continues below advertisement

But Dr. Santoch Rai also told the Alberta Review Board that if Mr. de Grood were to commit another offence, it would be severe.

A judge in 2016 found Mr. de Grood not criminally responsible for the killings because he was suffering from schizophrenia at the time.

A trial heard that the 22-year-old believed that the devil was talking to him and that a war was about to begin, signalling the end of the world, when he arrived at the Calgary party, which was being held to mark the end of the school year.

He killed Zackariah Rathwell, 21; Jordan Segura, 22; Kaitlin Perras, 23; Josh Hunter, 23; and Lawrence Hong, 27.

The review board decided last year that Mr. de Grood, with his mental condition in remission, could be transferred from a secure psychiatric hospital in Calgary to Alberta Hospital in Edmonton.

Dr. Rai told five board members on Tuesday that Mr. de Grood knows he needs to take his medication. The psychiatrist suggested that his patient should be allowed to have unsupervised trips to supervised places in Edmonton, as well as be eased into living in a group home.

Under the proposal, Mr. de Grood would eventually be allowed to travel within Alberta for up to a week, with prior permission. The proposed plan would take place over the coming year.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. de Grood was asked by a panel member what his feelings were about the plan.

“I believe in following the recommendations of the team. It’s a gradual step by step where I’m constantly proving I can handle stress. I’m always taking my meds and staying away from drugs and alcohol,” Mr. de Grood said.

“I agree with the progression.”

Dr. Rai said Mr. de Grood would like to be able to visit his parents, who now have a residence in Edmonton so they can be closer to him.

In a series of emotional victim-impact statements, some parents of his victims told the review board that their suffering continues. It was the fourth time the families have been asked to give victim statements.

“I know I look older,” Lorencio Hong said. “I feel older. I am a different man altogether.”

Story continues below advertisement

Patty Segura told the panel that she’s scared to open the window in her son’s old bedroom for fear of losing what remains of his scent.

Others said they feel no one’s being held responsible, as Mr. de Grood’s treatment is aimed at an eventual release.

That possibility is hard to stomach, Gregg Perras said.

He added that the families want to try to change that part of the law.

“We’re going to try to get absolute discharge off the table,” he said. “This whole process is broken.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies