Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

The new safe consumption site Prairie Harm Reduction is seen in Saskatoon on Sept. 30, 2020. Saskatchewan’s only supervised consumption site, which opened last year, is operating without government funding or support.

Kayle Neis/The Canadian Press

People who use drugs on the Prairies face inconsistent access to supervised consumption services even as fatal overdoses increase throughout the region.

Saskatchewan’s only supervised consumption site, which opened last year in Saskatoon, is operating without government funding or support, while Manitoba does not have any such services. In Alberta, the United Conservative Party government has been critical of harm-reduction services and is reviewing the province’s existing sites after ordering a report that criticized them as a blight on their neighbourhoods.

Experts say the situation has left people who use drugs with inequitable access to potentially lifesaving services.

Story continues below advertisement

“People who use drugs in some regions are not able to access the same degree and quality of health care as they are in others, which is, you know, not really consistent with the spirit of the Canada Health Act and the idea that all Canadians are deserving of health care,” said Elaine Hyshka, assistant professor at the University of Alberta.

Supervised consumption sites, which require federal approval, allow people to use drugs under the supervision of staff who can intervene in the event of an overdose. These facilities can also connect vulnerable people with community resources and reduce the spread of blood-borne infections such as HIV by providing clean needles and other supplies.

When governments approach supervised consumption and other harm-reduction services through a political lens focused on public support, it can have negative effects on people who use substances, Prof. Hyshka said.

“It sends the message that they’re not deserving of care and … that it’s appropriate to stigmatize people who use substances or have addictions.”

In 2020, 372 people died from a drug-related death in Manitoba, which is about a 200-per-cent increase compared with 2019, says a report by the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. About 68 per cent of these deaths involved at least one opioid, including fentanyl.

Manitoba is the only province on the Prairies without a supervised consumption site.

“In comparison to the rest of the country, we are way behind,” said Shohan Illsley, executive director of the Manitoba Harm Reduction Network.

Story continues below advertisement

Winnipeg City Council recently approved a motion to conduct a study on the feasibility of establishing and operating a low-barrier supervised drug consumption site in the city.

The provincial government looked at harm reduction as part of a review of addictions and mental-health services several years ago. The province hired Virgo Planning and Evaluation Consultants to review Manitoba’s health care system with a focus on the province’s mental-health and addictions services.

The final version of the Virgo report said increased access to harm-reduction supplies, supervised consumption and access to addiction services were the most valued service by the 101 people surveyed at provincial harm-reduction sites. A previous version of the report recommended a supervised injection site in Winnipeg, but the government said that version was a draft, and the recommendation was removed in the final report.

When presented with a separate report on the benefits of supervised consumption services, prepared by Sunshine House in 2019, Premier Brian Pallister tossed the report to the ground.

The following year, the federal, provincial and municipal governments created the Illicit Drug Task Force to address the rise in methamphetamine and other drug use in the city.

The task force’s final report mirrored some of the recommendations in the Virgo report, but did not recommend supervised consumption services and instead included several recommendations focused on the role of police to tackle the drug problem.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Illsley said harm reduction should not revolve around law enforcement.

“That is like the opposite of harm reduction,” she said.

The provincial government declined to make someone available for an interview, but spokesman Brant Batters said in a statement that Manitoba is working toward enhancing access to addictions medication, addictions psychiatric consultation services and several other initiatives suggested in the 2018 Virgo report. Mr. Batters did not comment on Winnipeg’s recent decision to study the idea of supervised consumption services.

Saskatoon’s Prairie Harm Reduction opened the province’s first supervised consumption site in October of last year after the province denied its funding request for $1.3-million to expand the site’s hours. Executive director Jason Mercredi said the province has denied them funding for the past two budget cycles. The organization has received about $300,000 from the Ministry of Health, for case management and naloxone trainers, and about $595,000 from the Ministry of Social Services for a program that works toward keeping mothers with their children.

After the provincial government rejected the funding request, businesses and private donors joined to raise more than $180,000 for Prairie Harm Reduction in April.

“We didn’t put out a call or anything, it’s just the community kind of rallied,” Mr. Mercredi said.

Story continues below advertisement

He said 62 businesses contributed and some are planning additional campaigns to keep the site open.

With the community’s funding, Prairie Harm Reduction’s supervised consumption site will be able to expand its hours in July.

Saskatoon and Regina accounted for 67 per cent of the province’s fatal drug overdoses in 2020, says a report from the Saskatchewan Coroners Service. In 2019, 67 people died from an overdose in Saskatoon and 114 died in Regina. Between January and May this year, there have been eight overdose deaths in Saskatoon and 22 in Regina.

Prairie Harm Reduction also sells merchandise designed by Joi T. Arcand, a Cree artist from Muskeg Lake Cree Nation, with half of the profits from those sales going to the Newo-Yotina Friendship Centre to open an overdose prevention site.

An overdose prevention site offers similar resources to a supervised consumption site, but it is considered a temporary response to a community in crisis. Provincial governments can approve overdose prevention sites, but only the federal government can approve a supervised consumption site.

“We need some leadership on this issue from government,” Mr. Mercredi said. “It shouldn’t be up to us selling T-shirts to stop people from dying.”

Story continues below advertisement

Saskatchewan NDP mental-health and addictions critic Doyle Vermette said the government is failing to support initiatives that can save people’s lives.

“That’s pretty sad when you have an organization that has to fundraise $180,000 … but the province can’t find $1.3-million in their billions of dollars,” Mr. Vermette said.

The Saskatchewan government declined an interview request. Jennifer Graham, spokeswoman for the Ministry of Health, said in a statement that the province is investing $458-million for mental-health and addictions services in its 2021-22 budget, including $750,000 for three new mobile harm-reduction buses across the province.

Albertans have by far the most access to supervised consumption services on the Prairies, but a change in government in 2019 has reduced the focus on harm reduction.

The United Conservative Party won that election on a platform that included reviewing the impact that supervised consumption sites have on neighbouring residents and businesses. The government ordered a stop to new sites shortly after taking office.

The province then launched a review of those sites. A report released in March, 2020, concluded that supervised consumption sites increase crime and disorder in neighbourhoods. The findings has since been widely criticized by public-health experts.

Story continues below advertisement

The government announced last week that Calgary’s only supervised consumption site, located inside the Sheldon M. Chumir Health Centre, would be shut down and replaced by two new sites at different locations.

A facility in Lethbridge operated by the group ARCHES closed in August after the province alleged the organization had financial irregularities. To replace those services, Alberta Health Services opened a mobile site in the city’s downtown.

Harm-reduction advocates have pointed out the mobile site is much smaller than the former ARCHES facility. Soon after it launched, the government said the mobile site was seeing 34 people a day, down from 60 a day at ARCHES before it closed. ARCHES had previously said it was getting an average of 663 visits a day before it was forced to reduce its capacity owing to the pandemic.

The Boyle Street Community Services site in Edmonton also stopped operating in October. Justin Marshall, press secretary for the associate minister of mental health and addictions, said there are potential plans to operate an overdose prevention service in an “underserviced area of Edmonton” with Boyle Street.

“There’s very little support for harm reduction from this government,” said Rebecca Haines-Saah, assistant professor in the department of community health sciences at the University of Calgary.

“The solutions that we require are public-health and harm-reduction interventions.”

In 2020, 1,316 people died from overdosing in Alberta, which is an almost 61-per-cent increase compared with 2019, the Alberta substance use surveillance system says. Most of these deaths happened in Calgary, Edmonton, Red Deer and Lethbridge.

After ARCHES closed, clients started using drugs in parks such as Galt Gardens in downtown Lethbridge. Former staff members from ARCHES formed the Lethbridge Overdose Prevention Society, which opened a pop-up overdose prevention site in Galt last fall.

“We very quickly realized that there was really no plan to do any sort of adequate replacement of services following the closure of ARCHES,” said LOPS board member Tim Slaney. “We decided that we had to do something.”

Mr. Slaney was issued 17 tickets for allegedly going against city bylaws by holding activities on city property without a permit. The courts dismissed the tickets on April 9.

“Nothing we were doing at the park was illegal,” Mr. Slaney said. He said overdose prevention sites are given exemptions from the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act, which allow them to legally supervise substance use.

The group hopes to operate another overdose prevention site at a commercial property in a few months.

“It’s really difficult to stay hopeful in the face of the amount of silence and indifference we’re seeing in Alberta toward this,” Mr. Slaney said.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies