Skip to main content

Canada Alberta NDP backbencher refuses to sit in legislature, claims party has ‘toxic culture'

Alberta NDP Leader Rachel Notley (centre), Calgary East candidate Robyn Luff and her daughter Vesper, eight-months-old, and Calgary-Fort NDP candidate Joe Ceci attend a campaign event at Ceci's campaign headquarters in Calgary, on April 8, 2015.

Mike Ridewood/The Canadian Press

A backbencher with Alberta’s governing NDP says she won’t take her seat in the legislature to protest what she calls a “toxic culture” in the party caucus.

Robyn Luff, a first-term legislature member for Calgary-East, says she can’t do her job representing her constituents because of strict controls placed on her by officials in Premier Rachel Notley’s government.

“I have felt bullied by the NDP leadership for over 3 1/2 years and it must stop,” Ms. Luff said in a letter released Monday.

Story continues below advertisement

“Under Rachel Notley’s leadership, every power that MLAs are supposed to have to be able to represent their constituents in the legislature has been taken away or denied from the start.”

Ms. Luff could not be immediately reached for comment.

In her letter, Ms. Luff said questions backbenchers ask of ministers in the house, designed to address issues of importance to constituents, are instead written by the ministries for the backbencher to deliver.

Such questions, colloquially derided as “puffballs,” have been used by previous administrations and governments in some other provinces.

Ms. Luff also said backbenchers can lose the privilege of making a statement in the house if a previous statement is deemed inappropriate.

She said party leadership decides who speaks on which bill, and statements and questions at committee hearings are all scripted.

Those who step out of line fear punishment, such as losing a spot on a committee or chances to speak in the house, she said.

Story continues below advertisement

“I have had members statements taken away, and (backbencher-sponsored) private members bills edited ‘til they weren’t what I intended.”

Ms. Luff added that she was told "not jumping when a (departmental) chief of staff told me to” has stalled her career.

She wants Ms. Notley to lead a public discussion on the issue and said she won’t return to the house until that happens.

Government house leader Brian Mason said the party is aware of Ms. Luff’s concerns and was trying to work them out. He rejected Ms. Luff’s assertion that she can’t speak her mind and represent her constituents, and added that governing demands working together.

“People are permitted to speak their minds, and they have an opportunity to do that,” said Mr. Mason. “Everybody in a caucus, especially large caucuses, is frustrated from time to time.

“But you take decisions and you go forward, and people have to realize that that’s the way government works.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Mason said Ms. Luff needs to make a decision rather than sit in legislative limbo.

“I don’t think it’s fair to her constituents to just say, ‘I’m not happy with how things work, so I’m not going to show up for work,“’ said Mr. Mason.

Ms. Luff is the second backbencher to quit Notley’s caucus.

A year ago, Calgary legislature member Karen McPherson quit and later joined the Alberta Party. Ms. McPherson said she has reached out to Ms. Luff and said Ms. Luff’s concerns dovetail with her experience in Ms. Notley’s caucus.

“I can certainly understand where Robyn is coming from,” said Ms. McPherson. “That was a lot of the reason why I crossed the floor.”

Jason Nixon, house leader for the Opposition United Conservatives, called Ms. Luff’s allegations “shocking and extremely alarming.” The NDP needs to take cues from his party and let people speak up, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

“That is not how our caucus operates,” said Mr. Nixon. “We have open discussions. Sometimes we’ve had free votes.”

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter