Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Energy ministers from Alberta, Saskatchewan and Ontario are urging Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer to reconsider her attack on Enbridge’s Line 5.

Dale G. Young/The Associated Press

Shutting down the Line 5 pipeline would create a “dangerous precedent” that would forever imperil future cross-border infrastructure projects between Canada and the United States, says Alberta’s energy minister.

Sonya Savage joined counterparts from Saskatchewan and Ontario in warning a House of Commons committee Tuesday about the knock-on effects that could result if the cross-border pipeline is shut down.

“What is possibly most concerning to Alberta, as it should be for everyone here, is the dangerous precedent that a shutdown of a safely operating pipeline would have and would pose for future infrastructure projects,” Mr. Savage testified.

Story continues below advertisement

“We are good neighbours and strong business partners. Our integrated energy sector and critical trading relationships are important for jobs and economies on both sides of the border, and any actions to shut down Line 5 would threaten that relationship.”

Line 5, which runs through Michigan from the Wisconsin city of Superior to Sarnia, Ont., crosses the Great Lakes beneath the environmentally sensitive Straits of Mackinac, which link Lake Michigan to Lake Huron.

For weeks, experts have been telling the committee that the pipeline is a vital source of energy not only for Ontario and Quebec, but a host of northern U.S. states as well, including Michigan itself, Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Enbridge wants to build a tunnel underneath the straits to house an upgraded version of the dual pipeline – a project Michigan has already approved – but needs the existing line to continue to operate in the meantime.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer has revoked the 1953 easement that allowed the pipeline to operate without incident for more than 65 years, accusing Enbridge of violating the terms of the agreement. She wants the line shut down by mid-May.

Enbridge is fighting that decision in court in Michigan – and Ms. Savage, Saskatchewan Energy Minister Bronwyn Eyre and Associate Ontario Energy Minister Bill Walker want Ottawa to weigh in on that fight.

“This could include filing an amicus brief in court expressing the government’s support for keeping the pipeline in operation,” Mr. Walker told the committee.

Story continues below advertisement

One senior federal government official, speaking on condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal matters, said filing such a brief is currently under discussion, but a final decision has not been made.

Witnesses also urged the federal government to exercise its rights under the 1977 Transit Pipeline Agreement, a Canada-U.S. treaty that provides for the uninterrupted flow of energy between the two countries.

The Enbridge main line, and by extension Line 5, carry as much as 70 per cent of the crude oil produced in Saskatchewan to market, Ms. Eyre said.

Line 5 is a “welded-steel manifestation, a tangible symbol, of a traditionally strong relationship, a friendship, between the United States and Canada – one we must not jeopardize,” she said.

“Pipelines produce no CO2 – they are a mere mode of transport, and yet they have become a symbol of the fight [over climate change].”

Sarnia Mayor Mike Bradley, whose city is a major refining hub in Ontario and the final juncture for Line 5, could barely contain his frustration with Ms. Whitmer, whom he said has been unresponsive to repeated entreaties.

Story continues below advertisement

“I’ve written more letters to the governor than St. Paul wrote to the Corinthians,” he said, noting that Canada’s consul-general in Detroit and Ontario Premier Doug Ford have had the same experience.

“I can’t fathom what is going on in the governor’s mansion in Lansing ... does the governor not understand the damage [she’s doing] to the ongoing relationship?”

In a letter to Ms. Whitmer earlier this year, Enbridge accused Michigan of refusing to acknowledge that the state’s own experts say there are no clear alternatives to the pipeline.

The state “fails to acknowledge that Line 5 enables the safe transport of fuel essential to heat homes and provides energy to Michigan, neighbouring U.S. states and Canada’s two largest provinces,” Enbridge executive vice-president Vern Yu wrote.

“It also fails to account for the significant adverse social and economic impacts that will result from closure.”

Scott Archer, a union leader in Sarnia, delivered a stark inventory of what those impacts might be if Line 5 is closed.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Archer warned of immediate gasoline shortages, “massive” fuel cost increases and 800 more oil-laden rail cars and 2,000 tanker trucks per day on railways and highways throughout both central Canada and the U.S. Midwest – to say nothing of widespread job losses in a variety of industries, many of them only tangentially related to the energy sector.

“In short, shutting down Line 5 would effectively kill my hometown, and displace its families – and many more cities and towns like it in Canada and the U.S.,” he said.

“This is not an exaggeration – it’s cold, hard fact.”

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies