Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Education Minister Adriana LaGrange says the group representing Alberta teachers is playing politics with a proposed new kindergarten to Grade 6 curriculum and isn’t sincere about real bridge-building.

The Alberta Teachers’ Association has publicly stated the proposed learning plan is “fatally flawed, and teachers, academics and curriculum experts should work on a revised version.”

“I have the utmost respect for teachers, and the work that they do, and the professionalism that they have,” Ms. LaGrange said when asked about the association Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

“I want them to weigh in on the curriculum,” she said. “The union for teachers appears to want to make it more political. I really don’t want to go down that path. I prefer to work collaboratively.

“The fact they have not reached out to me or my department since the curriculum has come out to set up a meeting, to have a discussion, speaks volumes to me.”

Ms. LaGrange’s spokeswoman, Nicole Sparrow, in a subsequent statement, said the minister’s door remains open.

“Alberta’s government will continue to work with the education system, including the teachers’ union, to gather all feedback to make this the best curriculum possible,” Ms. Sparrow said.

“It is clear that the union is more interested in political theatre than actually providing feedback.”

ATA president Jason Schilling lobbed the accusation right back.

“We need to have the whole curriculum redesign process depoliticized. In fact, I would like to see politicians get out of the way and let’s go back to the way we used to do curriculum redesign,” Mr. Schilling said in an interview.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Schilling said Ms. LaGrange cancelled a memorandum of understanding in late 2019 that had put teachers and other experts at the centre of the curriculum review. Teachers have fought for a place at the table ever since, he said.

“The association has essentially been shut out,” Mr. Schilling said.

“The minister is very well aware of the fact I have concerns about the curriculum, that I want to make sure that teachers are involved, (so) that we can get this right.”

The result has been a high-profile back-and-forth word fight. The teachers association says it was shut out of the curriculum consultation. Ms. LaGrange counters that 100 teachers were involved.

Mr. Schilling has said it was 100 teachers for two days who had to sign nondisclosure agreements.

The ATA has said 91 per cent of teachers in an in-house survey are against the curriculum. Ms. LaGrange has dismissed the survey sample she says was less than 7 per cent as minuscule.

Story continues below advertisement

Sarah Hoffman, the NDP Opposition’s education critic, said Ms. LaGrange and the United Conservative government need to meaningfully work with teachers who have the expertise and front-line experience on what works and what doesn’t.

“The minister is picking massive fights and trying to discredit teaching professionals who work to make sure students learn quality information to set them up for success,” Ms. Hoffman said.

The draft is to be piloted in select schools this fall and fully implemented in September, 2022.

To date, almost 30 of Alberta’s 63 school boards, including the public school boards in Edmonton and Calgary as well as francophone school boards, say they won’t teach it.

It’s been the subject of fierce debate since being outlined by Ms. LaGrange in late March.

Advocates defend it as a common-sense approach that includes basic concepts, such as multiplication tables, along with real-life skills for the information age, including how to budget and computer code.

Story continues below advertisement

The ATA and other critics say the plan is not developmentally appropriate for young kids, is jammed with random facts, and too loosely structured with concepts well over students’ heads. They say it pushes Eurocentric history while giving short shrift to francophone and Indigenous cultures and perspectives.

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies