Skip to main content

Canada Biologist fears extent of seabird mortality may grow after Newfoundland’s largest-ever oil spill

At least 15 oiled seabirds have been spotted after Newfoundland’s largest-ever offshore oil spill, and one biologist says past spills indicate the number could be in the thousands.

Husky Energy reported the sightings on Wednesday and confirmed one dead bird since an estimated 250,000 litres of oil spilled into the ocean on Friday during an intense storm.

The SeaRose platform was attempting to restart production when there was an equipment failure in a subsea line that released the oil.

Story continues below advertisement

Experts on seabirds say an estimate on the number of birds killed from oiling could be months in the making, but is likely to grow.

Gail Fraser, a leading seabird biologist at York University, said even a small number of oiled bird sightings are cause for concern and are likely a sign of much wider harm.

“The fact that they have found oiled birds means that there’s probably a lot more oiled birds out there,” Fraser said.

Prior oil spills have ended up with estimates of bird deaths that have grown into the thousands, she said.

The 2004 Terra Nova spill that released 165,000 litres of oil into the ocean is estimated to have killed around 10,000 birds.

The biologist noted the Terra Nova incident spilled less oil into the ocean, but it happened at the same time of year as the latest incident, meaning similar numbers of birds like murres and dovekies would have been in the area.

Fraser said “millions” of birds migrate to the region from the Arctic around this time of year, and the weekend’s rough conditions mean getting an accurate count of killed birds may be impossible.

Story continues below advertisement

“The conditions were terrible and that makes it a challenge to get good estimates of how many seabirds might be killed,” Fraser said. “It becomes kind of a hand-waving exercise and doing our best guess.”

The region’s birds are particularly sensitive to oil pollution, Fraser said. The birds can die of hypothermia if even a small amount of oil slicks their plumage.

They also have low reproduction rates and long lives, meaning a large hit to the population has a big impact.

Fraser thinks these characteristics are not always reflected when companies are fined for hurting seabird populations.

Syncrude Canada was fined $3 million in 2008 when more than 1,600 ducks were killed after landing in an Alberta tailings pond. By comparison, Petro-Canada was fined $290,000 for the Terra Nova spill believed to have killed 10,000 birds.

“To kill 10,000 seabirds is a big deal ecologically and the fine should reflect that.”

Story continues below advertisement

Scott Tessier, chief executive of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board, said no oil sheens were spotted on the water on Monday or Tuesday, meaning the oil has likely broken down to the point that it cannot be cleaned up.

The board is now focused on wildlife monitoring and its investigation into the incident.

Environment and Climate Change Canada said in an emailed statement Thursday that trained wildlife observers are surveying the area daily to determine which areas around the spill are a priority for monitoring.

The Canadian Wildlife Service will compile data to help build a damage assessment on wildlife populations.

World Wildlife Fund Canada on Thursday called the spill “a stark reminder of the need for tougher regulations and stronger oversight” in the framework governing Canada’s oil and gas activities.

In a statement, the group called for stronger regulations on spill prevention and response, a moratorium on new oil and gas licences in the Arctic and a ban on industrial development in marine protected areas.

Story continues below advertisement

The statement addressed the risk to birds and fish, writing that oil exposure in adult female fish can lead to offspring deformities and cause internal damage to marine mammals like whales and dolphins.

“The offshore boards have repeatedly assured the public that offshore operations are safe and there is nothing to worry about. This incident proves otherwise,” wrote Sigrid Kuehnemund, WWF-Canada’s vice president of oceans.

“Crude oil is a poisonous substance and doesn’t simply disappear. It sinks into the marine environment and continues to wreak havoc in the food chain.”

There are also concerns that the spill could pose a threat to the province’s fishery.

The province’s Fish, Food and Allied Workers union last week expressed concern the spill could threaten the fishery’s standing in the global market if buyers fear tainted product.

“An oil spill off of our coast, whatever the magnitude and source, threatens the livelihood of those who depend on the fisheries,” the union said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

“The potential for socio-economic ramifications on the fishing industry cannot be ignored by industry and government.”

Operators in Newfoundland’s offshore industry are responsible for following their own safety and environmental plans, and the regulatory board monitors and investigates when necessary.

Trevor Pritchard, senior vice-president of Husky Energy in Atlantic Canada, said his team followed the company’s plans and procedures, and his company is investigating what caused the equipment to malfunction.

“We’ve seen nothing that tells us we did not follow our internal procedures,” Pritchard said.

Husky provides the procedures to the regulatory board but a Husky spokesperson said in an email that the company “does not disclose its specific operating procedures publicly for security and commercial reasons.”

Pritchard says Husky won’t restart production until he has “full confidence” in the integrity of the subsea system.

Story continues below advertisement

“Nobody wanted to see this incident happen. It’s a bad day for us. Can we change things, yes we can. I don’t know what they are yet,” Pritchard said.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter