Skip to main content

Marie Deschamps, seen here on Dec. 17, 2015, told a House of Commons committee that victims of sexual aggression in the ranks aren’t served well by the military’s complaints process.

Richard Drew/The Associated Press

The Canadian military has been slow to change its highly sexualized culture, says former Supreme Court judge Marie Deschamps, who wrote a major report on the problem four years ago.

Testifying to the House of Commons defence committee, she said victims of sexual aggression in the ranks aren’t served well by the military’s complaints process.

Deschamps’s review, which concluded in March 2015, found an underlying culture “hostile to women and LGTBQ members and conducive to more serious incidents of sexual harassment and assault.”

Story continues below advertisement

Following its release, defence chief Gen. Jonathan Vance launched a wide-ranging effort known as Operation Honour to eliminate abuse, harassment and assault in the Forces.

Deschamps isn’t satisfied with it.

“So they, I think, tried to do too much internally,” she told the committee this week. “They need to rely more on people who are not as much imbued with the military culture.”

Deschamps said when she initially presented her findings, she stressed the need for a broad strategy to change that culture, which stretched from the enlisted ranks through to senior officers.

“Unfortunately, they’ve already taken four years and we don’t see the colour of the strategy yet,” she said.

Deschamps was also critical of the “duty to report,” which compels service members to report any criminal behaviour and trigger a formal investigation. The idea is to require anyone who learns of sexual misconduct to tell authorities about it so cases don’t get hidden. The effect can be to drag them into the open against victims’ wishes, and make victims reluctant to seek support.

A fall report from the auditor general was similarly critical, saying the policy increased cases reported by third parties regardless of the victim’s readiness to come forward. This discouraged disclosure by some victims, it noted.

Story continues below advertisement

Deschamps stressed the need for the military to take a more victim-focused approach, providing more support to them before pursuing sanctions against perpetrators.

“There has to be a balance and the first person you have to look to is the victim,” she said.

Vance last month said there were no plans to remove the duty to report — members of the military have a duty to report wrongdoing, he said in an interview with The Canadian Press — but that officials were looking at ways to empower and support victims.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies