Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Left to right: Liberal Leader Andrew Furey, Progressive Conservative Leader Ches Crosbie and NDP Leader Alison Coffin after their televised debate from the floor of the House of Assembly, in St. John's, on Feb. 3, 2021.

Paul Daly/The Canadian Press

Amid climbing COVID-19 case numbers, Newfoundland and Labrador election officials have postponed voting in Saturday’s provincial election for nearly half the province’s ridings.

Elections NL said in a news release Thursday that with community spread in the St. John’s region, polling station workers were backing out in droves over fears of contracting and spreading COVID-19.

In-person voting has been postponed in 18 of the province’s 40 ridings, stretching from St. John’s and its neighbouring city of Mount Pearl to the town of Carbonear, about 100 kilometres away.

Story continues below advertisement

“Many election workers have resigned out of fear of interacting with the public on election day,” chief electoral officer Bruce Chaulk said in the release. “We cannot hold traditional polls without the support of these people.”

Voting will proceed as scheduled in other parts of the province, but the results will not be released until all voting in the province has concluded. Mail-in voting options have also been extended.

Elections NL is calling the delay a “two-week circuit break.” In a subsequent news release, Chaulk said if the COVID-19 numbers improve over the two weeks, voting would be rescheduled.

Newfoundland and Labrador’s chief medical officer urged citizens to get tested on Thursday as COVID-19 infection levels kept rising. Dr. Janice Fitzgerald said in a briefing that 100 new cases have been detected, almost doubling the total active cases in the province. The Canadian Press

“However, based on the continually increasing COVID cases being reported in the region, there is no guarantee that we will be able to administer in-person voting safely at that time,” he said. He encouraged people to vote by mail-in ballots “to ensure the ability to participate in this election.”

The announcement came after Chaulk sent a letter Thursday to party leaders and independent candidates saying the growing community spread of COVID-19 constituted “a serious occupational health and safety issue” for poll workers.

“The current significant outbreak has had a profound impact on our ability to conduct a fair election, and immediate action is required to be taken,” he wrote.

Provincial health authorities reported a record 100 new cases of COVID-19 Thursday, a day after partial lockdown measures were introduced in the St. John’s region.

Story continues below advertisement

After an initial outbreak and lockdown last spring stemming from a funeral in the provincial capital, pandemic life for Newfoundlanders and Labradorians had been relatively normal, with daily case numbers in low single digits. That changed this week, after an outbreak began in Mount Pearl. On Thursday, officials said there were 210 active cases in the province – 194 of which were announced this week – and they expect that number to grow.

“I think people felt that COVID wasn’t here, we’ve been doing so well,” chief medical officer of health Dr. Janice Fitzgerald said Thursday. “I’m not judging anybody, it’s just what’s gotten us here, and what we need to change, so that we can get ourselves out of here.”

Progressive Conservative Leader Ches Crosbie said in a statement Thursday that Chaulk’s decision “creates two classes of voters, and is therefore wholly unfair.” Crosbie had called for the election to be delayed, but reiterated that he believes if voting is to be postponed, it should be postponed across the province.

“Simply put, some voters will have more time than others – and more access to information – to make their electoral decision,” he said. “That is wrong and calls into question the integrity of the electoral process.”

In a video call with media on Thursday afternoon, Liberal Leader and incumbent Premier Andrew Furey said Chaulk’s decision was welcome. He disagreed that staggered voting times would put anyone at an advantage. “These are different circumstances, so I think Mr. Chaulk did what was necessary in extending the (mail-in) ballots and delaying in-person voting,” he said.

Furey called the election on Jan. 15, but has said repeatedly he has no authority over how it is run and whether it could be stopped. He told reporters Thursday he had no say in Chaulk’s decision.

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies