Skip to main content

Countries, including Canada, are prosecuting people with HIV because they misunderstand science, leading researchers say

People with HIV are being unjustly prosecuted around the world, in large part because courts do not have a good grasp of medical research, say some of the world’s leading scientists.

“The application of up‐to‐date scientific evidence in criminal cases has the potential to limit unjust prosecutions and convictions,” said a group of top medical researchers led by Françoise Barré‐Sinoussi, a co-discoverer of HIV, in a consensus statement issued at the International AIDS Conference in Amsterdam.

According to the statement, 68 countries worldwide have laws that make non-disclosure, exposure or transmission of the virus a crime, and 33 other countries use different criminal provisions in similar cases.

Story continues below advertisement

Most cases involve sex between consenting partners or instances of kissing, biting or spitting in which there is no transmission of HIV.

Prosecutions are driven by the false beliefs that everyone with HIV is infectious and that infection with the virus is a death sentence, the scientists say. In fact, people taking antiretroviral treatment have suppressed viral loads and are essentially non-infectious.

The harsh, ill-informed laws drive people living with and at risk of infection into hiding and discourage them from being tested, said Linda-Gail Bekker, president of the International AIDS Society.

"Simply put, HIV criminalization laws are ineffective, unwarranted and discriminatory,” she said. “These laws have one thing in common: They misstate how HIV is transmitted.”

Edwin Bernard, global co-ordinator of the HIV Justice Network, said a handful of countries, including Canada, stand out for their aggressive approach to prosecution.

“The majority of the cases occurred in the United States, Belarus, Russia, Ukraine, Canada and Zimbabwe,” he said.

There have been 210 cases since 1989 in Canada in which the HIV status of the person charged was a central issue, according to the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network. In most of those cases, there was little or no chance of the virus being transmitted because of condom use, low viral load or low-risk activities such as oral sex. Yet the majority resulted in convictions.

Story continues below advertisement

Four years ago, leading Canadian AIDS researchers, led by Julio Montaner of the B.C. Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, issued a similar consensus statement in Canada.

That led federal Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould to issue a statement on World AIDS Day in 2016 acknowledging that there was “overcriminalization of HIV” in Canada and that the “criminal justice system must adapt to better reflect the current scientific evidence on the realities of the disease.”

Last year, the federal Justice Department issued a report titled “Criminal Justice System’s Response to Non-Disclosure of HIV.” It said the courts need to recognize that HIV is first and foremost a public-health matter and that the use of a blunt instrument such as criminal law should be a last resort. The report also noted that, when the law is used, it tends to disproportionately affect Indigenous, gay and black people.

However, despite increased awareness, there have been no prosecutorial directives cautioning against pursuing cases involving HIV non-disclosure by people with little or no risk of transmission.

One of the top scientific papers presented at the Amsterdam conference showed that people with low viral loads have virtually zero chance of transmitting HIV to their sexual partner, even if they do not use condoms.

That spurred a movement with the slogan “U = U, Undetectable = Uninfectious,” and Canadian Health Minister Ginette Petitpas Taylor wore a “U = U” T-shirt when she addressed the conference.

Story continues below advertisement

The singer officially launched the coalition at the 22nd International AIDS Conference in Amsterdam. Reuters


Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter