Sentencing arguments for the Quebec City mosque shooter ended Thursday with a forensic psychiatrist testifying that Alexandre Bissonnette’s murderous rampage was a racist act but not terrorism.
Gilles Chamberland, who spent four hours with Mr. Bissonnette on Wednesday, said the killer didn’t promote any type of ideology in carrying out actions that saw him murder six worshippers in January 2017.
He said Mr. Bissonnette, 28, had suicidal tendencies but that just taking his own life without doing anything else seemed insufficient for the killer.
Mr. Bissonnette then fabricated a racist hypothesis, “Based on things that are completely false,” which he needed to believe in so he could target the Muslim community, said Chamberland.
“It’s a crime that is too egotistic to be a terrorist act. But it is a crime steeped in racism, even if he doesn’t see it.”
When he pleaded guilty at the end of March to six charges of first-degree murder and six of attempted murder, Mr. Bissonnette said he was not Islamophobic.
Mr. Chamberland, who was testifying at the request of the Crown, told Quebec Superior Court Justice Francois Huot it’s difficult to assess the convicted killer’s potential for rehabilitation and that nobody knows what he will be like in 25 years.
While his first-degree murder conviction carries an automatic life sentence with no chance of parole for 25 years, Mr. Bissonnette can also receive consecutive sentences, which means he could spend up to 150 years in prison.
Justice Huot told the killer he is not ruling out a sentence longer than 25 years.
“It is a possibility,” he told Mr. Bissonnette directly.
“And it would be illusory on your part to believe you will be sentenced before September.”
That’s because Mr. Bissonnette’s lawyers want the Criminal Code provision that allows for consecutive sentences to be declared unconstitutional.
Justice Huot will hear arguments on that specific issue in the next few months.