Skip to main content
Open this photo in gallery:

The final report of a public inquiry into what the government of Alberta says is foreign funding of environmental groups opposed to oil and gas development was due on July 30, 2021.Todd Korol/Reuters

The public inquiry report into what the Alberta government labels troublesome foreign funding of enviro-groups was delivered Friday – a year late and million dollars over its original budget.

“When my final report is made public, I believe Albertans will gain a new understanding of how foreign funding has played an influential role in public policy and political discourse,” inquiry commissioner Steve Allan said in a statement after delivering the report to Energy Minister Sonya Savage.

“It us up to Albertans alone to determine how they wish to see their public policy and political will realized, unfettered by the influence of foreign monies.”

Savage has up to three months before she is legally obliged to release the report to the public.

In a statement, Savage said they will meet that commitment, adding “This report represents a significant milestone.

“We expect that decisions about our economy and the development of our natural resources must rest with Albertans and not well-funded foreign special interest groups.”

The inquiry was an election promise from Premier Jason Kenney, who said he wanted to get to the bottom of concerns Canadian environmental groups were being used as cutouts and cat’s-paws by competing foreign interests to stymie Alberta’s wellspring oil and gas industry.

Allan, a forensic accountant, was given the assignment in July 2019, but he missed multiple deadline extensions – the COVID pandemic and legal challenges were cited as reasons.

The inquiry cost a million dollars more than the original price tag of $2.5 million.

Critics say recently leaked draft versions of Allan’s report clears environmental groups of any law-breaking or wrongdoing but nevertheless tars them as “anti-Albertan” for challenging non-renewable resource projects on the grounds of environmental protection.

The groups have said any foreign funds make up a tiny fraction of their bottom lines.

They call the inquiry a buffoonishly sinister attempt to silence and intimidate them, with no public hearings, little evidence made public, little time to respond to accusations, and terms of reference so elastic they were changed twice.

“This has been something out of ‘Alice in Wonderland,”’ said Keith Stewart, a senior energy strategist with Greenpeace Canada.

“We got funding from international foundations. It was about two per cent of our revenue over a decade.

“We got a lot more money from Albertans.”

He said Greenpeace Canada has been one of the inquiry’s targets and that letters to Allan asking for information and details were ignored.

“We don’t even get to publicly defend ourselves or even see the evidence against us. (Allan) says, `I interviewed 100 people.’ He won’t tell us who they were. How are we supposed to respond to evidence that we’re not allowed to see?” said Stewart.

Allan, in a letter this week to Greenpeace Canada, made it clear that “anti-Alberta” is meant simply as a “a nonpejorative geographic modifier.”

University of Calgary law professor Martin Olszynski said “anti-Alberta” is not an innocent term but a broad-based slur, easily and gleefully weaponized by political opponents. He said it turns those concerned with the pace of resource development and its effect on the environment into scapegoats and depicts them as traitors to the community.

“The precedent (from the inquiry is) anything can become anti-Alberta, essentially anything that the premier disagrees with,” said Olszynski.

“To some extent a government has a democratic mandate, but it only goes so far. It can’t go to the point where opposition to that mandate – dissent – is branded as treason and sedition.

“That’s very authoritarian.”

Allan, in his statement, said he didn’t have the time or the money to conduct public hearings but instead pursued a “hearing-by-correspondence” process. He said those potentially impacted by his findings were given an opportunity to respond.

“I have endeavoured to hear from and report on the multitude of views on these matters,” he wrote.

Olszynski said there’s a good chance Allan’s final report will be challenged in court on the grounds it is procedurally flawed and reached unqualified conclusions.

“Inquiries are not courts of law but it’s not the Wild West,” he said.

Kathleen Ganley, energy critic for the Opposition NDP, said Savage should release the report immediately.

“Leaked drafts of the report show the inquiry relied on misinformation found in Google searches and `research’ conducted by the UCP’s own ridiculous war room,” said Ganley.

“But despite putting their thumb on the scale with this shoddy research, the inquiry was still forced to conclude there was no wrongdoing or illegal activity.”

We have a weekly Western Canada newsletter written by our B.C. and Alberta bureau chiefs, providing a comprehensive package of the news you need to know about the region and its place in the issues facing Canada. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

Follow topics related to this article:

Check Following for new articles