Skip to main content

Canada Developer offers to return disputed Oka land to Kanesatake Mohawks

A Quebec land developer has signed an agreement with the Mohawk Council of Kanesatake to return a parcel of pine forest that was central to the Oka crisis that began 29 years ago Thursday.

Gregoire Gollin says he acted in the spirit of reconciliation in an agreement reached last month and plans to cede 60 hectares of forest known as The Pines to the local council as an ecological gift through a federal government program.

“This is my contribution to reconciliation,” Mr. Gollin said in a phone interview Thursday. “Everyone is talking about reconciliation with the First Nations – for our Prime Minister, it’s a high priority.”

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Gollin has owned the land for 15 years and owns a lot of land in and around Oka. Two years ago, there were protests mounted by local Mohawks against a residential housing project spearheaded by Mr. Gollin that was allegedly encroaching on sacred Kanesatake pine forest.

Discussions about the land donation had been continuing for two years with Kanesatake officials and Mr. Gollin said he was hopeful the council would be accepted as a recipient under the federal terms.

“It’s a forest, there’s no development possible in this forest, it has a high ecological value, it has a high heritage value for the Mohawks, it was planted by their ancestors,” Mr. Gollin said.

According to the ecological gifts program website, owners who donate the property get tax benefits while recipients make sure the biodiversity and environmental heritage of the property are conserved in perpetuity. The program is subject to an assessment process.

“I was in position to have a dialogue with the Mohawks of Kanesatake and we accomplished an agreement,” Mr. Gollin said, adding it will now go to Kanesatake residents for consultation.

The donated land was part of lands central to the Oka crisis that began July 11, 1990. Gunfire erupted between provincial police and Indigenous protesters defending a small stand of pine trees resulting in the death of officer Marcel Lemay and sparking a 78-day showdown.

At the end of it, a deal was struck to bring down the barricades in exchange for cancelling the expansion of a golf course.

Story continues below advertisement

But nearly three decades removed from the explosive crisis, the disputed territory remains a long-standing, unsettled issue and development has continued.

“We’ve lost more land in the last 29 years than gained,” said Ellen Gabriel, a Mohawk activist and artist.

She called Mr. Gollin’s move a noble gesture, but one that does not go far enough.

“I gotta give my hat off to Mr. Gollin for trying in his own way what is reconciliation,” Ms. Gabriel said. “But which I think is really not because there are strings attached for this so-called ecological gift.”

Mr. Gollin said he’s also prepared to discuss the sale of an additional 150 hectares he owns in the area to the federal government to transfer to the community – nearly half of which he said is adjacent to land owned by Kanesatake.

Ms. Gabriel noted the local Mohawk council hasn’t shared details of the land donation agreement with the community.

Story continues below advertisement

Calls to the Kanesatake Mohawk Council weren’t returned on Thursday.

Local newspaper The Eastern Door, which first reported on the offer several weeks ago, quoted Kanesatake Grand Chief Serge Simon then as saying the matter would be brought to the community once details were finalized.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter