Skip to main content

The use of episiotomies has been declining for years, but the controversial procedure during childbirth may help more than it harms in certain deliveries, a new study suggests.

The study, published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal on Monday, looked at more than 2.5 million childbirths in Canada over a 13-year period and found an increase in anal sphincter injuries associated with vaginal deliveries involving instruments such as forceps and vacuums. The study also found, during the same period, a decrease in the use of episiotomies, which are vaginal incisions used to aid difficult childbirths.

Invasive episiotomy procedures have been found to have little medical benefit when performed during births without instrumentation. This has led to a significant reduction in the practice over the past two decades. “It’s been a triumph for women’s health,” said Giulia Muraca, who co-authored the study.

Story continues below advertisement

The problem, according to the study authors, is that episiotomies are becoming less frequent in all types of vaginal births, including those aided by forceps.

“The downside of this is that it’s kind of creeped into these deliveries with the assistance of instruments, and our research is showing that that is to the detriment of women’s health," said Dr. Muraca, a postdoctoral fellow at the reproductive epidemiology clinic of the Karolinska Institute in Sweden and the department of obstetrics and gynecology at the University of British Columbia.

Researchers studied all vaginal deliveries with gestation periods lasting between 37 and 41 weeks in Canada between 2004 and 2017. The study did not include data from Quebec and only included deliveries where a single baby was delivered.

According to the study, nearly 20 per cent of all operative vaginal deliveries resulted in anal injuries in 2017. The study also noted that operative vaginal deliveries make up just more than 10 per cent of all deliveries in Canada, according to statistics from 2012.

The study also showed that two-thirds of women who had never given birth to a baby vaginally before did not receive episiotomies during deliveries involving the use of forceps.

That statistic is alarming, said John Kingdom, a staff obstetrician at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto who was not involved in the study.

“You really should never do a forceps delivery without an episiotomy," said Dr. Kingdom. “That’s precisely why episiotomy was invented.”

Story continues below advertisement

He added that, if done properly, the procedure of a forceps delivery compounded with an episiotomy should not result in any lasting injury.

Data from the study show that forceps deliveries make up about one-quarter of all operative vaginal deliveries in Canada.

The authors of the study recommended more specific guidelines on the use of episiotomies in an effort to reduce the number of anal sphincter injuries.

The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada recommends that episiotomies be used “restrictively” during operative vaginal deliveries, according to the most recent edition of their clinical practice guideline.

“The guidelines around episiotomy and the use of instruments in vaginal delivery need to be more receptive of the current evidence," Dr. Muraca said. “My prescription would be that the SOGC guidelines reflect the evidence and not be up to interpretation.”

However, Dr. Kingdom said the guideline is grounded in practical clinical experience and is clear on when to use episiotomies during operative vaginal deliveries.

Story continues below advertisement

“[The SOGC guideline] states clearly that forceps are an acceptable, safe choice for delivery of a baby, and should be done with an episiotomy,” said Dr. Kingdom.

The guideline states that the decision to perform episiotomies “must be made by the treating clinician.”

In an e-mailed statement, SOGC chief executive officer Jennifer Blake said her organization reviews its guidelines “when new research is available, but there may be many reasons and many possible recommendations.”

Dr. Blake added that the SOGC has not yet seen the study and therefore could not “properly comment.”

Dr. Muraca said she hopes the study will help reduce the number of childbirth-related anal sphincter injuries.

“It’s always been dismissed or explained away as a natural side effect of childbirth," said Dr. Muraca. "It’s my mission to make this not a necessary part of childbirth.”

Story continues below advertisement

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies