Skip to main content
// //

The Desmond Fatality Inquiry is being held in Guysborough, N.S. Key questions remain about how a man with severe post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression and a possible traumatic brain injury could hold a licence to possess and buy firearms.

Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

Just more than a year before Lionel Desmond bought a Soviet-era semi-automatic rifle and killed three members of his family and himself, the mentally ill former soldier was forced to hand over all of his firearms to police.

The incident that led to the confiscation was the focus Tuesday of a provincial fatality inquiry that started hearings last month in a small town in eastern Nova Scotia.

The inquiry has already taken a close look at the role of the health-care system and whether Mr. Desmond and his family had access to help for mental health and domestic violence issues.

Story continues below advertisement

But key questions remain about how a man with severe post-traumatic stress disorder, major depression and a possible traumatic brain injury could hold a licence to possess and buy firearms.

On Jan. 3, 2017, Mr. Desmond legally purchased an SKS 7.62 carbine, which he later used to kill his 31-year-old wife, Shanna, their 10-year-old daughter, Aaliyah, and his 52-year-old mother, Brenda, inside the family’s home in Upper Big Tracadie, N.S.

As the inquiry resumed Tuesday, its 12th day of hearings, RCMP Constable Steven Richard testified that he and three other Mounties were dispatched on Nov. 27, 2015, to the home in Oromocto, N.B., where Mr. Desmond was living at the time.

Constable Richard said Mr. Desmond’s wife told police she had received texts from him indicating he was contemplating suicide.

“He was saying it was time to go,” Constable Richard told the hearing, adding that one of Mr. Desmond’s texts said he would see his young daughter in heaven.

The four officers knew Mr. Desmond had been diagnosed with depression and PTSD – and they were also aware he kept a firearm in his garage.

Mr. Desmond’s wife, who was living in Nova Scotia at the time, confirmed that her husband was being medically discharged from the military – he was based at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown in New Brunswick – and that the couple was having marital problems.

Story continues below advertisement

“Their relationship wasn’t the healthiest at that point,” Constable Richard said.

The constable testified that he arrested Mr. Desmond under the provincial Mental Health Act when it became clear he was a threat to himself, but the officer insisted the retired corporal did not appear to be a threat to anyone else.

“He was one of the most calm and straightforward people I ever arrested under the Mental Health Act,” the officer said. “There was no indication for me to believe he was a threat to others.”

Constable Richard’s testimony echoed that of several other witnesses who have said Mr. Desmond had the ability to keep calm and show deference to people in positions of authority, even when he was in distress.

The officer also testified there was no indication that domestic violence was an issue with the Desmonds, although he said he wasn’t sure if it was discussed.

After Mr. Desmond was taken to a hospital in Fredericton, the Mounties seized a Savage .223 rifle from a locked case in his garage. Police in Nova Scotia later seized two other rifles Mr. Desmond kept in the couple’s home in Upper Big Tracadie.

Story continues below advertisement

At the hospital, Mr. Desmond was assessed by a doctor for 20 minutes and released early on Nov. 28, 2015.

Constable Richard said he knew Mr. Desmond had a firearms licence, but it did not occur to him to take it from him because the former infantryman never made any overt threat to use a weapon of any sort. Constable Richard also said it was his understanding Mr. Desmond’s licence would soon be under review by New Brunswick’s chief firearms officer.

However, the inquiry also heard Tuesday that Mr. Desmond’s possession and acquisition licence wasn’t placed under review until Dec. 29, 2015, which meant he could have purchased a weapon during the month after the suicide call in Oromocto.

As well, the inquiry heard that on the day after the incident in Oromocto – Nov. 28, 2015 – Mr. Desmond travelled to the home he occasionally shared with his wife in Nova Scotia, where he called the local RCMP detachment and demanded to know where his guns were.

Later that day, the RCMP received a complaint from Shanna Desmond’s father, who alleged that Lionel Desmond was yelling toward his property, again demanding to know where his rifles were.

Constable Richard said it wasn’t until May, 2016, that he learned Mr. Desmond had submitted a medical assessment to New Brunswick’s chief firearms officer confirming he was not a threat to himself or others – and his licence was reinstated and his guns returned on May 13, 2016.

Story continues below advertisement

The inquiry has heard the assessment was produced by Paul Smith, a family physician who worked at Canadian Forces Base Gagetown. Dr. Smith has yet to testify.

Our Morning Update and Evening Update newsletters are written by Globe editors, giving you a concise summary of the day’s most important headlines. Sign up today.

Follow related topics

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies